Laserfiche WebLink
improvements on the Auto Mall site at Staples Ranch. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD -C (Planned Unit Development — Commercial) District. <br />Shweta Bonn presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br />of the proposal. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />John Gutknecht, Habitec Architecture, Applicant, stated that staff did a good job of <br />explaining the project in its staff report. He indicated that he did not plan to say anything <br />and was present to listen to what the Commission had to say as far as suggestions and <br />things they are doing well with the project and things they can improve on. <br />David Preiss, representing Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan), referred to Ms. Bonn's <br />statement that Vulcan had contacted the City when it learned of this proposal. He indicated <br />that he had no issue with the auto dealership but wanted to provide some background <br />about the Pre - Development and Cooperation Agreement which was entered into by the <br />Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority, and <br />Vulcan Materials Company in 2007 after years of negotiation. He stated that Vulcan owns <br />El Charro Road as its private access road to reach its mining operations on Stanley <br />Boulevard, some owned by Vulcan and others essentially leased through Pleasanton <br />Gravel and the Jamieson Company. He noted that the Agreement was a very successful <br />effort to open up these entire quadrants for development by reaching an accord as to how <br />consumer and regular traffic could be mixed with the heavy truck traffic that accesses the <br />quarry. He further noted that the Agreement included, in part, very specific details on how <br />El Charro Road and the new improvements to Stoneridge Drive and on the Livermore side <br />would be designed and constructed with no additional access taken on or off of El Charro <br />Road other than the intersections, with one exception that dealt with the southern end of <br />this property in the event there was a commercial portion much farther south on El Charro <br />Road. He added that the Agreement also discussed one emergency vehicle access (EVA). <br />Mr. Preiss stated that basically, he would like to make sure that the Commission <br />understands that under the Agreement, additional access off of El Charro Road requires <br />not only the consent of all the parties to the Agreement but also an amendment to the <br />Agreement. He pointed out that is not about putting one party's interests over the other but <br />for safety concerns. <br />Mr. Preiss stated that Vulcan had some concerns regarding exactly why this additional <br />access is being requested, what the need for it is, and why the City of Pleasanton would go <br />to an amendment of its Specific Plan even before this had been worked out among all the <br />parties to the Pre - Development and Cooperation Agreement. He indicated that this is why <br />Vulcan has requested an opportunity to sit down with staff and the applicant to really <br />understand what is being proposed here in terms of design and safety and making sure it <br />works, and to have full information and disclosure prior to the City of Pleasanton taking any <br />action on the proposal. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2014 Page 5 of 14 <br />