My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 070914
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 070914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:17:05 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:12:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/9/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Parekh stated that they take care of all their children and have not had any single <br />incident of injury or falling down or get hurt inside and outside the facility. She indicated that <br />they take care of every aspect of the child; they provide quality education and service that <br />is a benefit to the community, as well as a safe, loving, and caring environment. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Balch asked staff if San Marco Way has sidewalks. <br />Ms. Wallis said yes. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired if the sidewalk extends along the applicant's rear entry. <br />Ms. Wallis said yes. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired if there is no other closer guest parking to that road other <br />than what is denoted as the yellow area in the staff report. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that was correct. <br />Commissioner Ritter asked staff, assuming that the application for ten children is denied, <br />the applicant can still operate with six children under the City's current codes and laws. <br />Ms. Wallis said yes. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that the law has been six children or less, and the applicant has <br />not been operating within the code of Pleasanton since August 2013 when the facility went <br />up to 10 children. He pointed out that there is the first learning moment for the children: <br />you have to follow rules. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he also went to a Montessori school way back during the <br />pre- kindergarten era. He indicated that he thinks it is a great program, but this is probably <br />the wrong spot for it. He noted that a tiny 337 square feet for ten children is not a lot. He <br />stated that he and his wife used to take their children to childcare, and they made sure their <br />children were taken care of and had some running space. He indicated that he is very <br />supportive of daycares, but this one just seems like it is the wrong place. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that everybody wants good childcare and good education for <br />their children. She indicated that regardless of what decision the Commission made <br />tonight, she wanted to make sure the applicant and others understand that this decision <br />has nothing to do with the quality of education that the applicant is providing, which sounds <br />like a great experience for the children that are going there. She noted that State law does <br />require cities to support daycares with up to six children, and the Commission is certainly <br />able and willing to support that; however, it is a violation to increase enrollment if it has not <br />been given approval. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2014 Page 10 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.