Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Wallis continued that staff went through all the comments, such as "Add Policy and <br />Program to Goal 5 and add Programs to Policy 10," and while staffs responses are not <br />itemized, staff is looking to change and add Goals and Policies and move them around. <br />She noted that a lot of the Housing Element programs can meet the needs of more than <br />one goal and policy, so that although there were policies and goals that did not look like <br />they had implementing programs, they were actually addressed in other areas. She <br />added that when the final document comes back to the Commission, it will come with a <br />little cheat -sheet which will show which of the implementing programs can be identified <br />with which goals and policies because they do meet program goals for different areas. <br />Commissioner Allen requested staff to recap the Housing Element changes to the <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) when the IZO will be looked into again in the future <br />and what its implications would be. <br />Ms. Wallis stated that this question came up last week at the Housing Commission <br />meeting. She indicated that the timeframe for Program 16.2 will be changed. She <br />explained that currently, it just indicates that the timeframe is an annual review as <br />needed. She added that this was discussed, and it was determined that within a year of <br />the implementation of the Housing Element, the IZO will be reviewed and revised within <br />the timeframe of Program 16.2. <br />With respect to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), Commissioner Allen <br />inquired if staff thinks there is any intent that the State of California will identify any kind <br />of quota for units for developmentally disabled individuals in terms of targets that will <br />have to be met or if that will be just a subset of RHNA. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that it is a subset of RHNA. She stated that currently, there is nothing <br />in the law that would require any obligation to meet any disabled unit numbers or to <br />construct the units. She added that this is all based off of economics and viability, and <br />the City is just required to show that it has the capacity and has made a good faith effort <br />to meet these goals and policies. <br />Commissioner Ritter noted that former Councilmember Becky Dennis summarized a lot <br />of good details in the letter she submitted, and while he does not want to go through <br />each of them, he would want staff to look at those and make sure the wording is right as <br />the edits are done. He stated that he did not want to go into specifics, but Ms. Dennis <br />spent a lot of time on this and brought up some points where there are overlaps. He <br />added that he thinks it is worth looking at it because she does bring up some good <br />points in there. <br />Commissioner Ritter then noted that Policy 7 on page 4 -8 of the Housing Element says <br />"Encourage at least 50 percent of multiple - family housing units to be rental apartments." <br />He stated that he knows that nationally, 35 percent of people rent; he inquired if the <br />term "apartments" refers to just apartments or includes rental houses and <br />condominiums as well. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that it refers to any type of rental unit. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 5 of 29 <br />