My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052814
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 052814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:15:22 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:10:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/28/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Sherwood replied that there is an underground vault there and one right at the <br />corner. <br />Ms. Wallis stated that it is not certain if the underground vault is a City vault, a traffic <br />vault, or PG &E. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that from his view of the public plaza, the one thing he is <br />concerned about is actually the entry to the plaza because one will have to go farther up <br />or down Rose Avenue or Main Street to enter the public plaza, as opposed to having an <br />arch or something that would just let people go in and sit down instead of having to go <br />around to get in. He added that it lends more to exclusivity for the businesses actually <br />versus if the seating was separated and pushed farther towards the edges of the plaza. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the metal trellis cuts that corner and provides it some shape. <br />Mr. Sherwood replied that it created an anchor and provides the seating. He added that <br />Mr. Dolan could explain it better. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that staff actually asked for that component to anchor the corner, <br />although he understood Commissioner Balch's issue about feeling welcomed. He noted <br />that it is at the same location that the corner of a building would be if there were no <br />plaza, so staff felt fine with it. He added that he thinks there is enough of an opening on <br />the side that staff thought anchoring the corner was more important than that concern. <br />Mary Simmons, a resident of Pleasanton and the first cousin of the business owner <br />adjacent to the proposed project, stated that she was shocked and dismayed that there <br />was nobody else present to speak at the sadness of this project happening in <br />Pleasanton. She noted that there is no more Downtown Pleasanton two- and -a- quarter <br />beers, and this is important to her so she wanted that to be recognized. She added that <br />she is glad to hear the owner, who seems to have a big heart, say that he wants the <br />best for the building and for that corner. She indicated that this makes her feel a lot <br />better and is glad she came to the meeting tonight. <br />Elizabeth Clausen stated that she owned the building at 515, 519, and 521 Main Street <br />for many, many years. She noted that the proposed building is beautiful and that she <br />has some people who may want to rent space there, but her only concern is the <br />parking. She indicated that parking in Downtown Pleasanton is very bad and inquired if <br />people are going to be able to park in the lot next to the former Round Table Pizza, or <br />where they should park. She further inquired if the City will own the plaza and stated <br />that she would like an answer to her question about parking. <br />Frank Hamilton stated that he and his son own the property at 233 Rose Avenue, right <br />behind the building, and the two houses in between. He indicated that they have no <br />objection to this proposal and inquired if their understanding is correct that where the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 28, 2014 Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.