PC 042314 - Laserfiche WebLink

greenhouse gas (GHG) generation profiles are very important for the City because the City is charged with a reduction of GHG emissions by a certain time. She further noted that this means that the City needs to begin to look at all projects in terms of how much carbon they are putting in the air. She added that there is nothing wrong with this project by itself, except that it has displaced housing that was going to be mitigating the commute trips of other businesses in the City. She indicated that now the City has both the Workday project, whose impacts are uncertain as far as GHG emission is concerned, and the elimination of the Windstar project which would also have prevented trip generations from occurring. She stated that if it were to be found that the project did need housing as a mitigation for GHG emissions, it is important to recognize that this project will not pace sufficient lower- income housing fees to mitigate those impacts because the City Council has frozen those fees at the 2003 levels. She indicated that the Commission could perhaps make a recommendation that those fees be increased as this is a big project and there will be many employees working here. Ms. Dennis stated that the Workday narrative indicates that there is no definite timeline for moving the Workday workforce into this building; that they were not really sure about the construction timing or how quickly that needed to happen for them. In light of this, she indicated that she would very much appreciate a Planning Commission recommendation to do an expanded environmental analysis with more detail than what is in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Jocelyn Combs, Citizens for a Caring Community (CCC), stated that Ms. Dennis covered what CCC's major issues are, and she wanted to suggest there is time to wait before doing this. She indicated that there are very few sites left in Pleasanton, and taking a considerable amount of time looking at its impacts would be in everybody's best interests. She stated that she is not sure what the City's commercial /office vacancy rate is or could be in the future, noting that the Safeway buildings right down the street are going to be vacant soon in all likelihood. Ms. Combs stated that there will always be a need for housing, and that if houses are built here, they will always be full, as opposed to businesses which undergo changes when they are bought out or turn virtual. She noted that this has happened a lot in Pleasanton and is another reason to take a little more time and a closer look at what impacts this project may have. She stated that she knows it probably was not required, but the traffic and this project's impacts on 1 -580 resulting from the 900 -plus commuters into and out of this project should be considered as well. She recalled that looking at EIR's back in the days of Dublin's, Livermore's, and Pleasanton's projects, a 12 -lane freeway suddenly came to be, which is what the Tri- Valley is going to have in the next few years, and that is probably buildout. Ms. Combs concluded that there are very few non - controversial high- density project sites left within the City, and to lose one of those and put the City in a position of bringing more infill and more controversial projects is something the Commission needs to think about as well. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 6 of 27