PC 042314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Becky Dennis, Citizens for a Caring Community (CCC), stated that she just wanted to say a few things as she has already submitted a letter to the Commission with more details in it. She indicated that the highest priorities for CCC are to develop better program and policy structure for actually having workforce housing proposals come forward that are either non - profit in nature or are partnerships between non - profit and market rate. She noted that the Housing Element language says the City prefers those partnerships; however, this cannot be done if none are coming forward, so the City really needs to take a look at the structure and make it the obvious, good, smart financial decision for these developers and for property owners to say they need two kinds of developers: a non - profit and a for - profit to share the site, or just a non - profit. She added that because she does not want to penalize developers for doing this, this brings her to the other issue, which is funding. Ms. Dennis stated that there is a discrimination problem with respect to what the City has accomplished in terms of development for lower- income housing. She pointed out that the City has produced a lot of housing for very-low- income seniors at 100 - percent affordability; yet, because the City has relied on the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance and market -rate developers to set the affordability levels, it has not produced any housing for members of the workforce who earn between 51 percent and 79 percent or below 50 percent. She noted that the City will only provide units affordable to people who are in exactly 50 percent or exactly 80 percent, and that discriminates against the majority of the workforce, at 49.6 percent, who earn below the 50 percent or between 51 percent and 79 percent. She further noted that more and more, people who work in Pleasanton do not make a lot of money because they commute in and out of the City. Ms. Dennis stated that she has some ideas about funding, and if the City Council is not willing to raise the lower- income housing fee and there was a nexus, the City could devote a portion of its sales tax revenue to provide housing for the people who work in Pleasanton. She indicated that she does not know how much that would be or how much it makes sense, but Pleasanton has 40 percent of the retail in the Valley. She pointed out that if' /z percent of the sales tax was pledged for this purpose, it might make it more possible to accommodate this in any new developments that come forward. She added that affordable workforce housing would also be a mitigation for greenhouse gas emissions, and that it makes sense that funding for housing come from a source that addresses that requirement as well. She urged the Commission to look at this when coming up with ideas to send forward to the City Council. She indicated that she really liked the Housing Commission's idea of encouraging folks to rent their secondary units to members of the workforce. She added that the City needs to provide more incentives for this as well, and suggested that discounts on sewer and water might be good because the little extra income and the discount might encourage some folks to sign up. Lynn Kriegbaum thanked the Commission for working with the community on the original CM Capital plan for 177 apartment units and asked that it reconsider the rezoning of the remaining CM Capital property to avoid another 200 units that would be built on that site. She stated that when her family moved into their home almost 30 years ago, they were told that the site was a business park and would always and PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 14 of 27