My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 031214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:09:31 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:05:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Are the building designs, massing, heights, and colors and materials <br />acceptable and compatible with the surrounding area? <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she thinks this has really been thoughtfully done and <br />is compatible. She noted that she likes the colors and the architecture. <br />Commissioner Allen concurred that it was thoughtfully done and that she likes it as well <br />Commissioner Olson agreed <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he knows there are concerns about three stories, <br />but the City is trying to provide the units that are needed, and this is the only way to do it <br />with a beautiful garden -style look. He noted that that was the biggest concern with the <br />Pleasanton Gardens area, keeping that "cottage" look. He stated that it was been done <br />with a lot of thought and that he think it is beautiful. <br />Commissioner Ritter concurred and added that the lobby area for social gatherings is a <br />thought. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that it is very nicely done. <br />D. Is the proposed tree removal /replacement plan acceptable? <br />Commissioner Posson stated he thinks it is fine. He indicated that the development <br />needs to be accommodated, and he does not see any other alternatives at this point. <br />Commissioner Ritter agreed and added that the type of trees should be thoroughly <br />thought out so residents do not stumble. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that mention was made about the possibility of saving a <br />couple more heritage trees if something were done with the roundabout. He noted that <br />if someone made the wrong entrance and did not want to be at this particular place, the <br />roundabout can certainly help in getting turned around. He added that he does not <br />know if there is also a use for parking along that roundabout, particularly as it leads to <br />the common area building and to Mid Pen Housing's offices. He suggested that the <br />developer take another look if there is any way to save additional heritage trees. <br />Chair Olson stated that he is fine with the tree plan <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she is also fine with the plan but would like the <br />developer to take a look at whether there is a way to save a couple more heritage trees. <br />Commissioner Pearce agreed, stating that she always hate taking out trees, but she <br />thinks it is necessary. She noted, however, that the staff report did indicate that trees <br />165 and 164, which are Coast Live Oaks, could be preserved, and she supports that. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2014 Page 19 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.