PC 022614 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Pearce stated that she just wanted to make sure the Commission had the conversation. Commissioner O'Connor stated that the Commission had quite a few Work Sessions, and the applicants had even more with the neighbors. He indicated that there have been a lot of requests for changes, and he cannot think of any that the applicants have not actually come through and done. He noted that they have added a lot of articulation to these buildings and have improved the look a lot with all of the railings, the wrought iron, the gates, the roof changes, they extra brick. He further noted that the applicants have done everything the Commission has asked for, and he really thinks it is time to move on. Commissioner O'Connor moved to find that the conditions described in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15162 have not occurred as described in the Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR); that the previously prepared SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Addendum to the SEIR are adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA, re are no new or changed circumstances or information which require additional California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review of the project, and that the proposed PUD Development Plan and Development Agreement are consistent with the General Plan; to make the PUD findings for the proposed Development Plan as listed in the staff report; to find that the exceptions to the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines as listed in the staff report are appropriate; and to recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD -103, subject to the Conditions of Approval as listed in Exhibit A of the staff report with the modifications listed in the staff memo dated February 26, 2014, and of Case P14 -0086, the Development Agreement for the project, as shown in Exhibit B of the staff report. Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. PC- 2014 -09 recommending approval to the City Council of Case PUD -103, and Resolution No. PC- 2014 -10 recommending approval to the City Council of Case P14 -0086, were entered and adopted as motioned. Chair Olson called for a break at 8:15 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the meeting at 8:20 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 26, 2014 Page 16 of 21