My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022614
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 022614
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:07:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:03:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/26/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce stated that was right, and then it was gone and there was no other <br />conversation about it. <br />Commissioner Ritter noted that they still have the alleyway. <br />Commissioner Pearce said that was correct. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thought there still was an access on the other side <br />that was not so way far away, but they do have to go out through the front and come back. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE- OPENED. <br />Robert Natsch stated that he was at the meeting that the Commission is referring to and <br />that they did talk about a gate that the residents definitely do not want to see on the <br />Summerhill property to the Arroyo. He indicated that they already have public access to <br />the south side of the Arroyo with traffic, walkers, bicyclists, runners, and a lot of the general <br />public. He noted that it is open to the general public, there is a gate at Hacienda, and there <br />is another one halfway down the Arroyo. He stated that to have both sides of the Arroyo <br />open is just inviting more litter, more activity, more distraction, more noise, and is <br />something that the majority of the residents that he has spoken to at Parkside do not want <br />to see. For the record, he stated that he is sure that people behind him would be willing to <br />raise their hand if they support what he is saying, and that that is how the conversation <br />was. [Majority of the audience raised their hand.] <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Allen commented that it was absolutely important to get that feedback and <br />that she recalls the discussion. She stated that what strikes her more was thinking about <br />the public access from West Las Positas Boulevard and the children coming through the <br />property and having public access to the Arroyo. She noted that one of the items that the <br />Commission just approved on the Consent Calendar tonight was P14 -0002, City of <br />Pleasanton, an application to update the Pleasanton Municipal Code to implement a <br />Climate Action Plan to require that new cul -de -sacs within the City enable access for <br />pedestrians and bicycles where feasible. She indicated that where she is today is that <br />there is a principle of trying to encourage and make it easy for people to have access to <br />trails and bikes and walking, and she would come out in favor of considering access, <br />especially if it is just Summerhill because it is more or less somewhat private. She <br />continued that the second reason is that she walked the Arroyo today and similar to what <br />Commissioner Pearce mentioned, she did notice that there were about seven or eight or <br />nine homes that have private gates that are locked, which says that residents appreciate <br />and enjoy having that ability to have the access. She added that it just seems like the right <br />thing to do, and suggested that perhaps a reconciler would be that there would be a gate <br />code possibly so that the right people are using it. She indicated that she thinks of this as a <br />park, and she wants to encourage people to have easy access to parks. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 26, 2014 Page 14 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.