My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 021214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 021214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that staff believes the proposal is consistent with the EIR as it was <br />written and certified. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired further that staff is also taking the position that the <br />proposal is in compliance with the Specific Plan and the Hillside Residential District <br />Area plan <br />Ms. Stern replied that was correct. <br />Commissioner Posson inquired if the slide showing the proposed homes is Alternative <br />No. 1 or Alternative No. 2. <br />Ms. Soo replied that the slide shows what was originally proposed by the applicant, <br />which is neither of the two alternatives. She noted that the building for Lot 2 is at <br />515 feet, which is five feet higher than Alternative No. 1. She added that less of the <br />building envelope will be visible. <br />Commissioner Posson requested clarification that Lot 2 would either be five feet, or ten <br />feet with Alternative No. 2. <br />Ms. Soo replied that it would be five feel with Alternative No. 1, and 15 feet with <br />Alternative No. 2. <br />Commissioner Posson inquired if the house would probably not be visible at 15 feet. <br />Ms. Stern replied that was correct. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he would like to address the line of questioning that Commissioner <br />O'Connor was pursuing and noted that Commissioner O'Connor is thinking about <br />whether he can make the consistency conclusion. He indicated that staff's thought <br />process is that there is some tension in the Plan: it talks about protecting the hilltop and <br />ridgelines, but it also talks about not to grade the slope excessively and to save the <br />trees; and then it gives a general location of where the homes can go. He added that it <br />does not all work out perfectly. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated he had some follow -on questions: If the house is <br />dropped down 15 feet, what does the home have to look like now that it is in the <br />hillside? Does the house need to be stepped? And if so, how tall would that home be? <br />Ms. Stern replied that the Mr. Kirkpatrick would address that question. She stated that <br />the Alternative No. 2 staff looked at did have a flat pad and did retain the trees as <br />proposed. She added that it was flat enough to do that and get a sufficient building pad, <br />but it would require more grading and more off -haul. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she appreciated Mr. Dolan's comments that there are <br />trade -offs here. She indicated that she is just trying to understand all the variances <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 12, 2014 Page 9 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.