My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 012214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:05:50 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that with respect to carports, he is torn because he <br />understands the next -door neighbors and their view and what they are looking at, but he <br />also would really like to have seen the apartment complex have the carport as opposed <br />to open parking because it makes it a more desirable complex. He added that he <br />certainly know what it is like to leave a car outside and get dust all over it all the time. <br />He noted that there have been other variances that the Commission has granted and <br />have had no objections to, and this is the only one which seems to have an objection. <br />Chair Olson questioned if that item is still under discussion with that property owner. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the other property owner spoke tonight. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he is of the same opinion and understand both points <br />of view. He indicated that from the tenants' standpoint and from the developer's <br />standpoint, it is more attractive to have carports, but he understands the adjacent <br />property owner's concerns as well. He added that he would hope both parties would <br />continue to look at different options, and the Commission can then decide where it <br />wants to go when the project comes back. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that someone mentioned the large area of grass, and that <br />from an amenity standpoint, a grassy area is nice for residents to have as a recreational <br />area. He pointed out, however, that as everyone present may know, there is a water <br />shortage, and the Governor declared a drought. He addressed the applicant and stated <br />that they may want to look for alternatives to natural turf, maybe some type of artificial <br />turf to reduce the burden on irrigation. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the open area has been discussed and that he <br />believes that is where the barbecues would be located and maybe serve as a gathering <br />area as well. He stated that children may want to throw or kick a ball around, but <br />maybe it does not necessarily have to be all turf, some of it could be hardscape. <br />Zacky Abed, Project Landscape Architect from Van Dorn Abed Landscape Architects, <br />Inc., stated that there are barbecues on the south end of the pool and on the north end <br />of the green area which also has trellises and picnic benches. He indicated that the <br />Statewide ordinance allows high water use landscaping for 25 percent of the site, and <br />that is what the open area encompasses; everything else is low water use. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that because water is covered by the owners, synthetic <br />turf is certainly an option if they want to save on their water bill. <br />No action was taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 18 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.