My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 012214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:05:50 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks going from an eight- foot planter to an <br />almost six -foot planter is fine. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that, with staff's explanation, he is fine with it. <br />6. Is the revised landscaping in the rear acceptable? <br />Commissioner O'Connor said yes. <br />Chair Olson also said yes. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that Mr. Bowen talked about the acoustic properties of <br />masonry walls. He stated that he knows sound and that noise is a large issue for the <br />Parkside residents. He indicated that he would like to see some evaluation of the <br />attenuation properties of the wall in the design and whether there is not a better design <br />to better abate the noise. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not have a problem taking a look at it. He <br />noted that this was another added item Summerhill agreed to put in for the Commission, <br />so he is glad that they are already doing that. He noted that he does not know how <br />many more iterations are needed and that it looks like there's always something else <br />each time around. He added, however, that he does not have a problem looking at it <br />especially if it is a design. He stated that he heard one gentleman refer to it as a <br />straight flat wall. He noted that he has seen curved walls, but he does not know if it is <br />done for noise. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he definitely likes the landscape design. He indicated <br />that he appreciated how the applicant looked at that visual impact and tried to mitigate it <br />to the greatest extent possible. <br />Chair Olson inquired if all of the landscaping proposed is on the inside of that sound <br />wall so the closest thing to the Arroyo is the sound wall. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes, plus the vines that staff asked for. <br />Chair Olson stated that he is fine with what is being proposed. <br />Chair Olson noted that at the last Work Session, he raised the issue of access to the <br />Arroyo. He stated that he thinks there is no access here and hopes that would remain. <br />Ms. Stern replied that the access has been eliminated. <br />Chair Olson noted that there is nothing the Commission can do about the other side of <br />the Arroyo as that is not the responsibility of this project. He then asked the <br />Commissioners if they have any other questions. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 15 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.