My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 010814
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 010814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:04:56 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:00:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/8/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that there are a lot more private lots out there and that these three are the <br />ones included because they are the larger private lots. She added that all the rest are <br />either on- street parking or public lots. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that it looks like the 975 spaces available in that study never <br />maxed it and that those large ones are only 21 percent of the total. He noted that based on <br />study, it seems like the saturation point has not yet been reached but that is what the <br />concern is. <br />Ms. Stern replied that was correct. She stated that it is a question of where the parking is <br />in the Downtown: on the periphery at those peak times, not on Main Street and not on the <br />close side streets. <br />Commissioner Ritter indicated that he loves that plaza concept that staff came up with to <br />support the Downtown area. <br />Chair Olson referred to letter from the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA) and noted <br />that the first paragraph states that the PDA supports the proposed amendments with the <br />provision that the City replenish the funds being waived for the developer in exchange for a <br />public amenity. He inquired if the package being presented to the Commission requires the <br />City to make those deposits to the fund. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it does not. He indicated that this was an issue raised by the same <br />people when the item originally came before the City Council. He noted that it was not <br />something that the City Council included in its vote; hence, staff did not include that at this <br />time. <br />Chair Olson inquired if there is a plan for providing some sort of parking structure for the <br />Downtown. He stated that the reason he is asking is because other communities that <br />Downtown Pleasanton competes with have such parking facilities, such as the parking <br />structure in Livermore. <br />Ms. Stern replied that the City is in the process of acquiring some additional sections of the <br />Alameda County Transportation Corridor but that the City does not have any plans for a <br />parking structure at this time. She added that if something came up in the Downtown <br />where there might be some partnership with private development that will result in a <br />parking structure that the City can jointly pay for, the City would look at that possibility, but <br />there are no plans for that. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the City has actually acquired in fee all of the Transportation Corridor <br />within the Downtown with the one exception of that stretch next to the gas station that is <br />being proposed for remodel, and the City has an agreement to purchase that and acquire in <br />fee as soon as the cleanup of the plume that the gas station created over time is <br />completed. He indicated that the plan is to continue to extend parking up the <br />Transportation Corridor. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 8, 2014 Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.