My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 010814
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 010814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:04:56 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:00:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/8/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern stated that the staff report includes a parking study which concluded that parking <br />is tight on Main Street and some of the adjacent side streets during some of the peak <br />times, particularly on weekday evenings, weekday afternoons, and Saturday afternoons, <br />but that parking is available along the Transportation Corridor and on parts of Peters <br />Avenue and farther out areas. She noted that Mike Tassano, City Traffic Engineer, is <br />present to respond to any questions. <br />Commissioner Allen referred to Peter MacDonald's email regarding valuation of the <br />property and land values per square feet. She noted that Mr. MacDonald's valuation <br />method was very different from that in the staff report, indicating that land in the Downtown <br />has never sold for over $100 per square foot, versus the methodology used in the staff <br />report which brought up the cost of the land to over $660 per square foot. She asked staff <br />to explain the methodologies and why one was chosen over the other or if there is flexibility <br />there. <br />Ms. Stern explained that calculated as an opportunity cost, the formula is basically the <br />number of square feet that the owner is foregoing development on, times the rent that it <br />could have gotten from that area, times 12 months to determine the annual income, and <br />then divided by the capitalization rate percentage. She continued that applied to 511 Main <br />Street, the calculation would be 666 square feet of plaza, times $3.75 monthly rent per <br />square foot, times 12 months, divided by 6.5 percent capitalization rate = $461,076. She <br />added that Pamela Ott, Director of Economic Development, is present and may want to add <br />more information on the matter. <br />Commissioner Allen inquired if that included all the building cost. <br />Ms. Ott explained that Mr. MacDonald's calculation refers to the cost of acquiring the land <br />and the cost of constructing the building itself, which are the fixed costs that go into the <br />consideration. She indicated that staff is actually looking at current market value of <br />property, which includes the capitalization rate. She added that this formula includes the <br />calculation of what the opportunity gained or opportunity lost to that property owner is as a <br />result of using land for a public plaza rather than for constructing a building. <br />Commissioner Allen inquired if it included all improvement costs that the tenant needed to <br />make. <br />Ms. Ott said yes. She stated that the capitalization rate includes the operating income and <br />cost, and factors in the capital cost as well. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that it might be of interest to the Commission to know, in terms of the <br />history of that one particular site, that the City wanted the plaza, that it was the City's <br />thinking that there had to be some way to make the developer whole instead of just <br />demanding that the plaza be provided, and that it was the City's idea to have a set of rules <br />to use elsewhere. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 8, 2014 Page 5 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.