Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dolan explained that that is exactly the point. He stated that if the antenna is <br />concealed, most people are not even going to know it is there; but if it is just a fake tree and <br />the people know it is there, the community does not want to be looking at those or knowing <br />that they are there. He added that staff is just trying to balance so it can get support, or not <br />large amounts of opposition, to these improvements. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he hears from different people all the time and inquired <br />if these changes will give enough so that coverage gaps can be eliminated. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that that is a question best answered by the carrier. She pointed out <br />that AT &T said it would be supportive and that if the Commission wants to consider <br />loosening it, that would be great. She indicated that staff did get a letter which was <br />forwarded to the Commission, from the attorney for Verizon, stating that this is not far <br />enough albeit happy that the City is making a move in the right direction, that there should <br />not be buffer zones; he advocated that it should be allowed in residential as well. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that if all else fails, if the Commission cannot get them into <br />any of those "other" areas, the Commission still has that ability. <br />Ms. Harryman said yes. She stated that that is something staff added, the sixth item, the <br />exception to meet Federal or State law. She indicated that southeast Pleasanton is a great <br />example because it is so residential, residentially zoned, and residential in nature. She <br />stated that If the carrier can show that there is a significant gap in coverage in this area and <br />wants to close it, staff needs to locate and then pick a property, and work with them on <br />alternative sites. She added that this is something that the City Council or the Planning <br />Commission could ultimately approve. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that these are repeaters and that there is really no noise; they <br />just move the signal between towers. He noted that the bigger the cell tower is, the more <br />RF it gives; so if the fewer towers out there, the lesser the RF. He indicated that it is <br />actually better to have more towers because it means less strong waves coming through, <br />and that is a positive. He added that it used to be analog and a cell phone ring could be <br />heard through a radio; but it is going digital now, and digital is a lot safer signal than the old <br />analog. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that the other thing he wanted to bring up is if the distance were <br />changed from 300 feet to, say, 100 feet, the antenna could actually, possibly, likely be <br />concealed better, such that instead of the homeowners looking out when they are drinking <br />their wine, they could move right next to it. He stated that the Commission or the Council <br />might want to consider that too because it just presents more options, and knowing it is not <br />putting the community at risk is the biggest thing he is in favor of. He noted that schools <br />and parks have them, and Livermore has them all over the parks. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 13, 2013 Page 48 of 50 <br />