My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commission, they all actually signed and agreed that this was a concern. He suggested <br />that the City should maybe need to think about something more than just sending this <br />yellow card. <br />Mary Switzer stated that her first question is why the rush on East Pleasanton when the <br />City already got the 1,500 units approved, and all of a sudden this has to be done right <br />now. She indicated that it may not be built out, and she has no idea what the build -out <br />time is, and inquired if there is a time that this all has to be approved and gotten <br />through. She noted that people have not had a chance to assimilate all the units that <br />have been approved around Hacienda and Stoneridge Mall. She inquired how all this <br />would impact traffic, noting that one cannot get out on 1 -580 on Fridays, and El Charro <br />Road is going to be like Isabel Avenue, another cut - through but coming into Stanley <br />Blvd. She added that there is also the concern about schools. <br />Ms. Switzer stated that her second question is, if the City Council gives final approval to <br />those other units, if they would have to be built and what the timeframe would be; if all <br />of them will have to be built once they are approved. <br />Darrin Lounds, Executive Director for the Housing Consortium of the East Bay, stated <br />that they are thrilled to be working with Sunflower Hill to create a vibrant, supportive, <br />affordable community for young adults with autism and developmental delays. He <br />indicated that they are encouraged by the work of the Planning staff in the East <br />Pleasanton Specific Plan Task Force and are glad that affordable multi - family is <br />included in the Preferred Plan. He requested that as the Commission thinks about <br />affordable housing in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan, it consider an affordable <br />housing community that will meet the needs of their friends and neighbors with <br />developmental delays. He noted that there is a significant housing need for adults, <br />especially young adults, with developmental delays, and that 600 affordable homes will <br />be needed in the Tri- Valley region over the next ten years. <br />Mr. Lounds stated that, as the Commission may be aware, SB812 requires local <br />jurisdictions to account for the housing needs of adults with developmental delays in the <br />next Housing Element realm. He indicated that housing like Sunflower Hill will help <br />Pleasanton address this requirement. He noted that affordable housing developments <br />for people with developmental delays have very low parking demands, and similar <br />projects across the region have successfully earned parking variances allowing for more <br />green open space and amenities adjacent to the housing, creating a very nice <br />community especially if transit is available. He added that these developments also <br />have minimal impact on the K -12 school system; knowing that that is a big concern and <br />they feel that Sunflower Hill feel has a solution. He indicated that lastly, Sunflower Hill <br />is looking to presenting at the November 7, 2013 East Pleasanton Specific Plan Task <br />Force Meeting and look forward to seeing the Commission members and staff there. <br />Blair Wolfinger stated that he supports most of the things that Ms. Liang mentioned and <br />that he is encouraged by all the people that have come out from their development. He <br />expressed concern that the Option for the 1,430 units was completely removed from <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 33 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.