My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
blended or are is the Commission limited to picking one of these six options that are <br />listed. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Commission can amend anything and create something less <br />than the highest one that it has evaluated. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if it would be really comparing the six Alternatives if <br />what is picked is one that has not been specifically studied in the EIR. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that was correct. He indicated that what will be approved is <br />something that is an amended version of one of the Alternatives. He acknowledged that <br />it would be easier to do the finding and all the other things if what is approved is very <br />close to one of the Alternatives; a whole different approved project can be crafted and <br />still use that environmental analysis. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that that might be harder to do. <br />Commissioner Ritter inquired if the Plans can possibly be changed based on the <br />analysis and as feedback is received. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Julie Testa noted Mr. Dolan's brief statement about "Asks" that have recently come from <br />the Pleasanton Unified School District (PUSD) and stated that she actually commended <br />PUSD for finally being honest and waving a red flag saying that Pleasanton needs <br />multiple schools and that it does not have the ability to build them. She indicated that <br />PUSD has come right out and said that there is going to be a school attached to the <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan and that someone is going to have to give PUSD the <br />land and build the school. She added that PUSD has accepted the demographers <br />report, confirming that every campus in Pleasanton is over capacity on several different <br />levels and exceeds the General Plan recommendations. <br />Ms. Testa stated that the Planning Commission has an obligation to take seriously what <br />is in the General Plan. She indicated that 1,500 additional units have been approved, <br />and the City is looking at another 1,759 units with the Preferred Plan; yet every campus <br />in Pleasanton exceeds the Pleasanton General Plan recommendations, and there is no <br />plan whatsoever to mitigate the growth in the schools. She added that this does not <br />even address the severe impact to the middle schools and the high schools. She <br />reiterated that PUSD has finally said that this is a problem and that it cannot continue to <br />move forward and ignore this huge problem. She stated that lovely neighborhoods are <br />an asset and that it would be nice if growth is mitigated before it becomes a crisis. <br />Ms. Testa stated that the Planning Commission knows that SB50 says not being able to <br />mitigate school growth cannot be taken as a consideration if this Plan gets so far along <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 29 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.