My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Gateway projects were approved, plus the other projects that are already <br />moving through the process; so this number, as it stands right now, could potentially be <br />smaller as more projects are approved. <br />Chair Pearce inquired if it matters that approved properties do not get built before 2014 <br />and if they then do not go into the 2014 -2022 planning period. <br />Ms. Stern replied that once projects are approved and even if they are not built during <br />that housing period, they are off the table unless they lose their approval, in which case <br />the City can approve them again. <br />Ms. Stern then presented the second table below which looks at how the Preferred Plan <br />and the different Options meet some of those requirements that outlined in the first <br />table. <br />Percent of RNHA provided by Preferred Plan and Options <br />Plan <br />Percent of 2014 -2030 RHNA Need <br />Low/Very Low Moderate Above Moderate <br />RHNA Need <br />1,213 Units <br />810 Units <br />832 Units <br />Preferred <br />375 units/ 31% <br />241 units/ 30% <br />1,143 units/ 137% <br />Plan <br />1,759 units <br />Option 1 <br />305 units/ 25% <br />195 units/ 24% <br />500 units / 60% <br />1.000 units <br />Option 4 <br />393 units/ 33% <br />250 units/ 31% <br />641 units/ 77% <br />1,283 units <br />Option 5A <br />510 units/ 42% <br />276 units/ 34% <br />973 units/ 117% <br />1.759 units <br />Option 5B <br />570 units/ 47% <br />299 units/ 37% <br />890 units/ 107% <br />1,759 units <br />Option 6 <br />574 units/ 47% <br />383 units/ 47% <br />1,322 units/ 159% <br />2,279 units <br />Ms. Stern noted that the first row shows the estimate of the units to be planned for, <br />which is basically about 1,200 Very-Low- and Low; 810 units in the Moderate category <br />which is 23 units per acre; and 832 units of Above - Moderate which is anything less than <br />23 units per acre and basically all of the single - family that Mr. Rasmussen has shown <br />on the various Options. <br />Ms. Stern stated that she has to correct a mistake made in the staff report that implied <br />that the Low and Moderate units that were zoned for those densities in the Preferred <br />Plan met 50 percent of the City's requirement. She noted that they actually meet only <br />30 -31 percent of the remaining need in the Preferred Plan for both the 30 units per acre <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 26 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.