My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
recent planning processes. The Task Force will most likely borrow heavily from <br />those since it has currently had a dialogue on what should certain types of <br />development look like, what should the setbacks be, and what should the parking <br />requirements be. <br />The Draft EIR and the Draft Specific Plan is projected to be done in the first <br />quarter of next year, at which point it will start going through the regular public <br />review process. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he would be happy to answer more questions and anticipates that <br />some of them would be particularly on this idea of a Preferred Plan and what it means <br />tonight. He indicated that he has spoken to a few of the Commissioners who have <br />expressed concerns about that. He stated that he would be happy to get into it a little <br />bit more deeply, but for the time being, he would like Wayne Rasmussen. Project <br />Consultant, to run through the final Alternatives, starting with what the Task Force <br />labeled the "Preferred Plan." He added that the Commission will hopefully be able to <br />discuss these and come up with a recommendation to the City Council as to whether or <br />not it agrees with the Task Force's recommendation on the Preferred Plan or if it has <br />something different that it would like to recommend to the City Council. <br />Wayne Rasmussen displayed a site map, noting that the planning area is 1,110 acres <br />located just to the north of Stanley Blvd and to the east of Valley Avenue, with the 1 -580 <br />freeway to the north and El Charro Road extending down from top end of the plan area <br />to Stanley Blvd. at the bottom. <br />Mr. Rasmussen then presented a slide of the Preferred Plan. He stated that this Plan <br />calls for a total of 1,759 housing units and proposes a mix of 65- percent single - family <br />and 35- percent multi - family housing. He noted that this Plan is similar in many ways to <br />the Alternatives that was presented to the Commission a couple of months ago, as are <br />the other Alternatives. He indicated that some aspects of the site are pretty much fixed <br />as far as the lake area, for example; 704 acres of the site consists of Zone 7 Water <br />Agency or lake areas, two of which Lake I and Cope Lake are owned by Zone 7 Water <br />Agency and the third lake, Lake H, is currently owned by the Pleasanton Gravel <br />Company but is scheduled to be dedicated upon completion of reclamation to Zone 7 <br />sometime later next year. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that, as he had indicated earlier, there are a number of features <br />of the plan area that are pretty much fixed and show up similarly in all of the options. <br />He indicated that some office, business uses and potentially lake front retail areas such <br />as restaurants are being proposed to the north at the top boundary of the plan area. He <br />stated that there is a three -acre site located at the crossing of the lakes which is being <br />called a destination use area that might accommodate some sort of conference facility <br />or special restaurant or some sort of use that would be unique to this area in this <br />location with the views out in all directions that are really quite nice. He continued that <br />going down through the plan area, non - residential uses are being proposed in two areas <br />which are both in the Airport Protection Area (APA) which does not allow for residential <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 20 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.