My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091113
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 091113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:55:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that underground parking is usually an economic question in terms of <br />being able to make that pencil out. She added that so far, there is no development that <br />has gone into Pleasanton that has been able to achieve that. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Kevin Ebrahimi, Vice - President of Development, Summerhill Apartment Communities, <br />and Applicant, stated that Summerhill Apartment Communities is a privately -owned <br />company headquartered out of San Ramon, under the Summerhill Housing Group that <br />has been building apartments and for -sale housing in the Bay Area since 1976. He <br />indicated that Summerhill is somewhat familiar with Pleasanton and its requirements, <br />having built two for -sale communities in Pleasanton in the past ten years, the first being <br />Nolan Farms off of Rose Avenue in 2001, and Sycamore Heights off of Sycamore Creek <br />Way in 2005. He thanked staff, particularly Ms. Stern and Ms. Soo, who have been <br />very helpful in coordinating and helping them put the application together to meet all the <br />guidelines and to understand what the community is looking for. <br />Mr. Ebrahimi stated that staff has covered the project well in its presentation and that he <br />just wanted to outline some of the reasoning why the site was developed in the way it is <br />being presented to the Commission tonight. He indicated that the proposed community <br />fronts West Las Positas Boulevard, with existing commercial buildings to the east and <br />west, and existing residential communities to the south. He noted that due to the <br />location of the Arroyo, the site layout allows only a minimum distance of 244 feet from <br />the residential neighboring fence line on the south side of the Arroyo to the proposed <br />buildings, although the distance actually goes much farther from some houses on the <br />south side. <br />Mr. Ebrahimi then presented a slide showing the current view of the proposed <br />apartment community taken from the closest neighbor in the existing residential <br />development on the south side, with the proposed landscaping shown at a five -year <br />maturity. He indicated that in reviewing the Design Guidelines and meeting with staff <br />and the neighbors, they developed the site layout by adhering to the required setbacks <br />and stepping the buildings for better interface with the surrounding uses. He noted that <br />Buildings C and D were designed with two- and three -story elements, with all <br />three -story components in Building D and the recreation building on Building C's <br />two -story stepping up to a three -story on the three units to its left. He explained that the <br />reason they did that was to try and reduce the height of the buildings on the south side, <br />based on their meeting with staff and the neighborhood. He stated that they were <br />asked to lower the units on the south side at one point so they could take it away from <br />West Las Positas Boulevard, but the ultimate direction that they received was to step <br />the site and have more two and three stories on the south side, which is what they have <br />done, and then step it up to four stories. He noted that the center of the community is <br />all four stories, including the four -story element turns on Buildings A and B going up the <br />paseo area, which are all internal; and to try and do three stories with four -story <br />elements as it gets to West Las Positas Boulevard. He noted that it was kind of a mixed <br />decision as nobody wanted to see it be all four stories; however, as they ultimately had <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 6 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.