My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091113
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 091113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:55:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
has informed it of what is coming up so it can plan accordingly for its facilities. She <br />noted that City staff has done that all through the Housing Element Update process and <br />with those changes to the General Plan. She added that there is also a Liaison <br />Committee where members of the School Board and the City Council meet regularly to <br />discuss these types of developments. <br />Ms. Stern stated that at last night's meeting, the School Board accepted a <br />demographer's report that actually has a couple of recommendations related to two new <br />schools, one of which would be in the northwestern area, potentially in the Hacienda <br />Business Park area, and the other one, potentially long -term out there ten years, in the <br />East Pleasanton area. She noted that the District is definitely looking at a long -term <br />need for schools rather than at an immediate need at this point. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked Ms. Stern, for the benefit of the audience, if she can <br />touch on how many children are expected in this type of development which is a rental <br />as opposed to an ownership and a single - family. <br />Ms. Stern replied that it would be less than for a single - family. She stated that the <br />demographer's report may have made assumptions and scenarios based on different <br />assumptions because the City has not built anything parallel to this development built in <br />the last ten years. She indicated that she thinks the District has been using data from <br />Dublin, and there is some discussion about whether that will be reflected in the <br />Pleasanton case or not. She added that she believes the data that the District has used <br />is something around .4 school child per unit. She stated that she can get some more <br />accurate information on that if the Commission wants to do the study. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that he thought it .7 child per unit. <br />Chair Pearce stated that she would be interested in seeing that report when this <br />application comes back to the Commission. <br />Mr. Dolan stated the Archstone apartment complex has also been considered as a <br />source of data and that staff has some decent data on that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that some people sometimes think that these projects <br />are loading up the schools but there are probably only somewhere between 50 and <br />75 students. <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that staff has what it needs and will work with the applicant on the <br />Commission's recommendations. He noted that there will be some challenges in <br />moving the pool, but staff will certainly explore different locations and ways to screen it. <br />He added that one of the biggest issues seems to be moving the bulk around from the <br />back row but that he has some ideas for that. <br />No action was taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 26 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.