Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Pearce stated that she agreed with Commissioner Allen. She noted that she also <br />agreed with the four suggestions from staff, as well as with Commissioner O'Connor <br />about the colors. She indicated that what she would like to see come back to the <br />Commission are actual color samples that the Commissioners can look at using their <br />little white -light day lamps that they do not get to use a lot and get excited about when <br />they do. She noted that this is a major thoroughfare and she wanted to ensure that the <br />Commission gets not only the detail but also the color palette right. <br />Chair Pearce stated that she is taking her prerogative and adding a sixth question for <br />the Commission's consideration. <br />F. What additional information do you need the applicant to come back with? <br />Chair Pearce noted that Commissioner Posson wanted a visual analysis and she asked <br />for a color palette. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he sees the challenge here is, if the Commission <br />wants to get everything on the Arroyo down to two stories, there are seven units back <br />there that have to go somewhere. He added that he is not sure the City wants to have <br />all four stories up front, but even if that were done, there is room for only five in the <br />current design, and he does not know if there is a way to shrink all seven of those that <br />are back there and how much redesign would be required. He indicated that he would <br />like to see whatever options the applicants can get in, maybe get a different roof design <br />to bring the height down somewhat, or sink the back row a little bit. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he would like to see a little more outreach with the <br />residents. He indicated that the City Council passed Ordinance 2030 that basically <br />rezoned this for an apartment complex, and so this is going to happen somewhere <br />along the line. He added that this is a process, and the Commission wants to make <br />sure it makes sense. He noted that all this feedback is good, and how they get <br />implemented needs to be figured out. He suggested that the applicant talk to each of <br />the City Councilmembers because that is important. <br />Commissioner Posson echoed Commissioner Ritter's statements. He suggested that <br />the applicants have multiple input meetings with the residents as the design matures to <br />make sure to get their comments and their buy -in, so the applicants clearly understand <br />what the residents are saying and they clearly understand what the impacts are. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she would like to see mature trees added to the visual <br />analysis to show what it would look like, fully developed. She indicated that she agreed <br />with the multiple meetings. She stated that the vision she has for the applicant might be <br />like that of the applicant who came to the Commission recently who, two years ago, had <br />many people in the audience like today complaining about the project; and by the time, <br />the project came forward to the Commission, there was only one resident present, and <br />that resident wanted to compliment the developer on what a fabulous job the developer <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 24 of 27 <br />