My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091113
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 091113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:55:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
24 feet. He noted that he likes the idea of stepping -back for the higher buildings <br />towards the West Las Positas Boulevard side. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he is fine with the circulation and was trying to <br />figure out where the headlights would go, but he thinks that for the most part the layout <br />of the buildings is fine. He indicated that he was also looking for a two -story area for the <br />pool versus the tot lot in the common area. He added that in larger developments that <br />he knows, the pool is usually more central. He also expressed concern about putting <br />the pool in the middle of four -story buildings as he does not know where the sun is <br />going to be and where the shade would be. He stated that when he first looked at this, <br />he thought that it would be fine if the pool were properly screened from the Arroyo, but <br />he just thought if that was where the pool remained, he would like to see the one <br />apartment building next to the pool, not on the recreational facility side but on the other <br />side, brought down to a two -story in order to give more sun to the pool area. He <br />indicated that he would not have a problem with moving it up to be more central, except <br />that it would get into a shady area. <br />As regards the tot lot, Commissioner O'Connor stated that there would be three - <br />bedroom units but how many children will actually be living in the complex will not be <br />known until they get there. He noted that the tot lot looked very large compared to the <br />pool area and the open green area, and he believes more families will be using the <br />open green and the barbecue area than just a tot lot. He added that tot lots are <br />generally used only by younger children. He indicated that he would like to look a little <br />bit more at the sizes of those three areas. He also noted that if the tot lot were moved <br />to the back, then the noise the children will be making there could bother the neighbors. <br />Commissioner Olson stated he is fine on the circulation. He indicated that he is not <br />really excited about four stories anywhere and that the buildings along the Arroyo <br />should be limited to two stories. He noted that he was surprised when he drove over <br />there about how wide the Arroyo is and is glad that there would be only a five -foot delta <br />between the edge of the Arroyo and that of the new buildings versus the current <br />building. He added that the pool should probably be moved to the middle or farther up <br />and the open green to the back. <br />Commissioner Allen stated she is fine with the layout and agreed that the Arroyo side <br />should be limited to two stories. With regard to the pool, she indicated that she would <br />like the applicant to ideally look at an option with the pool more toward the middle, or <br />alternatively keep it where it is but working with the neighborhood on the kind of <br />screening as well as noise abatement through the right kind of wall. She agreed with <br />Commissioner O'Connor that the tot lot could possibly be reduced in favor of more open <br />space. <br />Chair Pearce agreed with what almost everyone has said. She stated that she is fine <br />with the circulation and would prefer to see two stories along the Arroyo if at all <br />possible. She indicated that densities absolutely need to be feathered. She added that <br />she is not thrilled about four stories but does not know if there is any way to get the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 21 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.