My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091113
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 091113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:55:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
noted that they have neighbors and relatives who have had things stolen out of their <br />yard, and the drag marks go down to the Arroyo. She expressed concern that the crime <br />in their area will increase because of that. <br />Ms. Natsch stated that the trees shown on the slide did not provide any kind of <br />screening for the residents of Parkside. She indicated that they do not they do not care <br />about an eight- to ten -foot hedge; they want tall trees. She added that the ones on the <br />slide were sparse; they want a screen, one every five to ten feet, as they need to <br />preserve their quality of life. She indicated that they have been really proud of the City's <br />Planning Department with the way they have parks in every subdivision, and they would <br />like to preserve that. <br />Ingrid Wetmore stated that she has lived in this neighborhood for 28 years and has <br />enjoyed living there. She indicated that if she had to purchase her home again knowing <br />what was going to happen to her in her backyard, she would not purchase it anymore. <br />She stated that she realizes the need for low -cost housing but questioned why it has to <br />be so many apartments right in her backyard. She noted that this will affect the value of <br />her home. She stated that she was really proud of the Pleasanton Planning Department <br />and how Pleasanton was laid out as a charming city. She noted how most of the <br />buildings on West Las Positas Boulevard are now one or two stories, and there is not a <br />single four -story building there. She indicated that she thinks this project will definitely <br />change the character of their neighborhood and will make it look much more like Dublin <br />than Pleasanton. <br />Ms. Wetmore stated that her main concern is the height of the apartments. She <br />indicated her strong objection to four -story buildings there and thinks they should not be <br />more that two stores as they presently have only one or two story buildings there. She <br />stated that she is not too happy with the development and wishes it would not happen, <br />but she realizes it is probably going to happen and that there will be more down that <br />road on West Las Positas Boulevard because there are several other buildings that the <br />Commission has already recently considered. <br />Karen Ellgas stated that she took some pictures of the area and would like to share it to <br />bring a little more focus on the project. She indicated that she objects to the number of <br />low- density, reduced -rate, low- income residential units that are being proposed, not just <br />for this particular property but also along the entire West Las Positas Boulevard in the <br />near future. She indicated that she understands that the State requires Pleasanton to <br />rezone some properties and wants to put in on record that she was at all those <br />meetings. She noted that many of her neighbors were also at all those meetings, and <br />being Pleasanton residents, they all support Pleasanton and want to make it as easy or <br />as painless as possible for the City to appease the State. She added that she <br />understands from Ms. Stern and Ms. Soo that these properties have to have 30 units <br />per acre, regardless of whether or not they are zoned for low- income residential. She <br />stated, however, that they do not have to be low- income, and that the City probably has <br />to give a developer a reason if it does not approve its application. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 11 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.