PC 082813 - Laserfiche WebLink

Regarding the points that were raised that, first, this is a give -away and that the community is not getting anything in return, Commissioner Olson stated that he thinks that totally misses the idea as the businesses pay taxes here. He noted that businesses that come into Hacienda generate local jobs and the whole idea of mixed - use, and it just blows his mind that this is not seen as helpful for the community. As to the second point that this will set a precedent, he stated that, again, this is based on the cap, and he does not see what is sacrosanct about the cap. He indicated that he would not be in favor of any changes here and that he is in alignment with staff's recommendation. Commissioner Ritter stated that he is looking at this as a simplification of the government process, cleaning up the way this old PUD was put together. He noted that he is always in favor of reducing government bureaucratic processes, and it makes sense in the new economy. He added that he does not sense that it goes contrary to anything that the Master Plan is trying to do and noted that the Commission will still see all of these as permits come through and will be able to review them to make sure they fit in line with what the caps are that are out there. He noted that this is a nice way to clean up this process, make it more business - friendly, and help the citizens. He added that he is also in favor of the way the staff report is written. Commissioner Posson stated that he thinks this is an equitable clarification of the ordinance and also addresses the current needs of the community. He noted that where there was a need for more housing, industrial and commercial areas have been converted to mixed -use areas. He added that things are going to continue to evolve, and as projects are proposed, the Commission will have the opportunity to look at those, evaluate the impacts, and determine if there is any additional limitations there. He indicated that he is also supportive of staff's recommendation. Chair Pearce stated that she is also supportive of staff's recommendation. She commented that Commissioner Olson and she were talking before the meeting about how they felt like this issue has been around forever and that, in fact, this was one of the Planning Commission's priorities sent up to the City Council when the Council created its list of priorities. Chair Pearce stated that she believes it is equitable. She noted that she honestly is not a big fan of the cap and that as mentioned earlier, it feels like political pressure way back when, similar to the housing cap. She noted that if the Planning Commission has the opportunity to review projects as they come through for impacts and things like that, she does not really understand the concept of an overarching cap. She further noted that the infrastructure is in place, the Commission is treating all the sites the same, and this is a net zero to the City. She added that something like this that is equitable and reasonable and allows Hacienda to continue to be competitive makes a lot of sense to her and does a lot of good for the City. She reiterated that she is supportive of staff's recommendations in its entirety, although, if the last six words are unnecessary and old language, she is amenable to taking them off. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 28, 2013 Page 12 of 16