Laserfiche WebLink
by the Housing Commission. He added that this is the specific purview of the Housing <br />Commission, who makes its recommendation to the City Council, who makes the final <br />decision. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the term "undermining" is difficult, as the City and developers are <br />in a new environment relative to inclusionary housing in that there is currently a court <br />case that basically made most inclusionary housing laws, and the City is trying to use <br />the standards that were previously applied but without the teeth of law behind them. He <br />noted that as in all projects, the City has negotiated terms with the individual <br />developers; and in this particular case, they have been difficult negotiations, and the <br />Housing Commission has not been happy with all the proposals, but they accepted it, <br />voted for it unanimously, and considered it to be one of the better negotiated solutions. <br />He stated that while the City has not achieved 100 - percent compliance with previous <br />inclusionary housing requirements, this is considered by the Housing Commission and <br />staff to be a very reasonable solution in that regard, and staff would not recommend that <br />the Planning Commission hold up the project to have the Housing Commission and staff <br />renegotiate the agreement. <br />Acting Chair Olson thanked Mr. Dolan for the clarification. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the dollar amount that the developer was paying for <br />each of the 97 single - family homes was in lieu of some percentage going to <br />lower- income housing units. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that everything was up for negotiation because, theoretically, the <br />former IZO requirements are not available for the rental units, but the developer is <br />offering low- income rental units to get the discount in terms of the fee on the <br />single - family units. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if those dollars would then be targeted for a certain <br />fund or if there was no recommendation yet as to where the $519,532 would go. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he does not think there is anything specified but that the funds <br />typically go into the Lower- Income Housing Fund that is then available to assist other <br />projects with their affordability requirements or anything that the City sponsors. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he goes to the Safeway site a couple of times a week <br />and that the developer did a great job with that development there; however, he was <br />concerned about the project entry into the Safeway parking lot and noted that the flow of <br />traffic through there over the past year has gotten worse. He indicated that he was <br />looking at the traffic plan and it shows that during the peak hours, there are some <br />360 cars coming in and 400 exiting through the Koll Center Parkway and Bernal Avenue <br />traffic light, and there is always a queue right there. He noted that he is aware it is a lot <br />better with a lot lower traffic count than what the office complex would have been going <br />into that shopping center. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 14, 2013 Page 7 of 17 <br />