My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072413
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 072413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:49:24 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:45:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/24/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Pearce noted that some of the Commissioners have not had the opportunity to <br />have the discussion about stepping homes versus the flat pad and the differences in the <br />elevations and asked staff to speak to the visual impact of the stepped homes at 40 feet <br />versus the 30 feet. <br />Ms. Stern replied that the main difference is that less grading is required when the <br />homes are stepped so a more natural slope can be maintained. She noted, however, <br />that when this is done, the house sort of cascades down the slope and can create some <br />areas where there is a visual experience of the house being taller than if it were on a flat <br />pad. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked staff to speak to staff's preferred layout and if staffs <br />concern is mostly with heritage trees. <br />Ms. Stern replied that the originally proposed layout does not touch any of the trees. <br />She noted that maintaining the natural appearance of the hillside with the trees goes a <br />long way in satisfying the objectives of the Specific Plan. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that if this proposed project is looked at independently of other projects <br />in the neighborhood, it is probably the most sensitive to the land. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if all the heritage trees are oak trees. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Frank Berlogar, Applicant, stated that he lives on the property and that when he started <br />looking at submitting an application for the three -lot hillside residential development, he <br />came to the conclusion that it was not possible to get three lots up there and have it <br />look reasonable, as it would be too massive and have too much of an impact. He <br />indicated that he made a number of decisions: first, to apply for two lots instead of <br />three; and second, to put the road between the new homes and the existing homes to <br />avoid the backyard -to- backyard impact on neighbors, which would be a more sensitive <br />approach. <br />With respect to the oak trees, Mr. Berlogar stated that he loves the oak trees and that <br />they were the main reason he bought the property. He indicated that he really wanted <br />to maintain the trees and that he believes the initial application for the two lots is the <br />best plan for that site and would like consideration on that. He indicated that the <br />architect who developed the design guidelines for the existing Silver Oak homes and <br />developed the design guidelines for these proposed two homes as well as prepared the <br />photo simulation is present tonight to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 24, 2013 Page 8 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.