My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071013
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 071013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:48:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/10/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks that is the tradeoff the Commission is <br />looking for, maybe not for every one of the conditions, but he would be a lot more <br />amenable to the changes that Ms. Hardy is looking for if something could be done with <br />this house. He indicated that he has not thought about just the visual look to the house <br />as opposed to the integrity of the home; but he is not looking for a full remodel, he is not <br />looking for somebody to rebuild it, but if were safe and sound and had some visual <br />appeal to match the rest of the development or the rest of the neighborhood and did not <br />look like it was falling down, he would be a lot more amenable to all the rest of the <br />changes mentioned. <br />Chair Pearce stated that her sense is that the applicants are looking for an up or down <br />vote, and she thinks the applicant can see the direction in which the Commission is <br />headed. She asked Ms. Hardy if this is still what they want or if this is something where <br />if the house situation is a concern, they can go and work on it and the Commission can <br />continue this item. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that they would like to have an action by the Planning Commission <br />tonight, and if her understanding is correct, they go to the Council next as the Planning <br />Commission is the recommending body to the Council. <br />Chair Pearce asked Mr. Dolan if this goes to the City Council. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. <br />Chair Pearce asked Ms. Hardy if they want a vote. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that they would ask the Commission to render its decision so they <br />can then go to the City Council. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that this beautiful development is coming in, and Stanley <br />Boulevard is getting upgraded, and wondered if there is a way to take that lot 13 and <br />maybe somehow make that entrance into a park and then upgrade that house. He <br />indicated that he knows that the City is waiting for the Historic Preservation Task Force <br />to assess, but he thinks this is the grand entrance to this development, and it needs to <br />be done right. <br />Chair Pearce agreed. <br />Jeff Schroeder, Ponderosa Homes, stated that they have spent a lot of time on what to <br />do with this house. He indicated that, frankly, it is not their business, they don't know <br />that business, and it is a different business than their business. He noted that it is pretty <br />expensive to move it, as Ms. Hardy had stated earlier, and so they figured that is not <br />going to work. He stated that the property owner's representative is not here tonight, <br />and they were hoping he was going to be here. He further stated that they told him they <br />were willing to work with him, but he already has some people who are interested in the <br />property, who might be interested to turn it into some sort of commercial use, an office <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 10, 2013 Page 19 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.