My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lot of difference. He noted that all four Alternatives are pretty close in terms of what <br />would need to be found in the rest of the City. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he understood Commissioner O'Connor's point. He explained that <br />the average is approximately 250 per project, and in chunks of 250, the average would <br />be somewhere around eight acres. He noted that these should be thought of in terms of <br />how many of these projects are really going to be available. He questioned if, for <br />example, one apartment is built on 400 acres of developable land, if it would be <br />necessary to have that few to reflect the character of the rest of the town. He displayed <br />the graphic that staff had prepared for the Housing Element Update that shows where <br />multi - family is concentrated within the City, and replicating that character is not <br />necessarily a mathematical equation. He noted that one can drive up the west side of <br />the City for miles and not see any multi - family development; then driving up into <br />Hacienda and around there, there is a little more, and there are some in the Downtown. <br />He added that the experience varies quite a bit, depending on where one is in town to <br />derive the character based on the type of housing. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that it is interesting that although there is nothing in the <br />East area, it is still being studied. He further noted that there is not a lot that have been <br />rezoned before that is even close to that area. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that was correct. He indicated that there has been a fair amount of <br />comment, and if the quadrant defined as East/West is split by Santa Rita Road and <br />North /South is split by Stanley Boulevard, there is not a lot in there. He stated that it has <br />been pointed out by Task Force members and even by a previous Councilmember that <br />the Auf der Maur site, which will be coming before the Commission in the near future, is <br />pretty close; and then the Irby property will come forward in the next round and rates <br />very highly for consideration, which is not too far away either. <br />Mr. Dolan emphasized that his point remains that the East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br />area is the only wide -open space that the City has left. He indicated that Commissioner <br />O'Connor's point that the differences are not that much is a good one; however, it is <br />something that the City needs to be sensitive to when considering how many apartment <br />projects of this size can be put out there and still maintain the character so it still feels <br />like the rest of Pleasanton. He reiterated that he just wants the Commission to have <br />another chance to absorb that information and see if there was anything else it wanted <br />to share with the Council. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that something that came up quite a bit at the last <br />meeting was that the Commission realized that it will be necessary to come back to the <br />entire City, but it does not want to necessarily have to come back to the East side after <br />it has been planned. He added that the Commission was thinking that when all the rest <br />of the numbers come up around the rest of the City, the 25- percent/75- percent mix may <br />have to change, and there was pretty much consensus among the Commissioners that <br />going up to about 35 percent was an acceptable number. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 9 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.