PC 061213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mix of Single Family and Multifamily Units and Comparison to RHNA Mr. Dolan stated that his main point is made primarily by this second table which shows the four Alternatives that were presented to the Commission at the last meeting: e The first column shows a wide range of unit totals starting with 1,000; 1,426; 1,710; and 1,283. The second and third columns show the breakdown in terms of how many of those in the various Alternatives are single - family and how many are multi - family, which vary quite a bit. e The fourth column shows the percent of the multi - family units for low, very -low, and moderate income RHNA requirement and how much of the requirement would be addressed in each of those Alternatives. Mr. Dolan stated that this includes two RHNA cycles and shows how much of the RHNA requirement for low, very-low, and moderate multi - family units would be accommodated in the plan area if those Alternatives were adopted just how they were. He pointed out that these Alternatives range from 25 percent up to 61 percent. He noted that there has been a fair amount of discussion about how this is a wide open area and there is no other comparable place in town, and about what is the appropriate percentage of the City's future RHNA to place in this quadrant. He indicated that it is a legitimate question, and most people have been mindful of the Council's previous policy discussion that the City will not put all these units there and would like to achieve some sort of a balance. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 7 of 25 TobN Units Numberof Numbarof Multi Numberof Numberof 25% Number of Singh Muld -hmlty ramlty Single Multi. Multl- muMF Fatuity Unite Units in Units as a Femilyat family at family as family In Aftemadve Pementof 75% 25% aPercent unite Altemadve low, wry- of which low and estimated would moderate RHNA for need to be income W1,low, located RHNA Low and elsewhere require- Moderate In City msnt Aftemative 1 1,000 500 500 25% 750 250 12% 1,773 Altemafne2 1,420 485 981 48% 1,070 357 18% 1,888 Attemative3 1,710 488 1,224 81% 1,283 428 21% 1,595 Aftema8ve4 1,283 841 843 32% 982 321 18% 1,702 Mr. Dolan stated that his main point is made primarily by this second table which shows the four Alternatives that were presented to the Commission at the last meeting: e The first column shows a wide range of unit totals starting with 1,000; 1,426; 1,710; and 1,283. The second and third columns show the breakdown in terms of how many of those in the various Alternatives are single - family and how many are multi - family, which vary quite a bit. e The fourth column shows the percent of the multi - family units for low, very -low, and moderate income RHNA requirement and how much of the requirement would be addressed in each of those Alternatives. Mr. Dolan stated that this includes two RHNA cycles and shows how much of the RHNA requirement for low, very-low, and moderate multi - family units would be accommodated in the plan area if those Alternatives were adopted just how they were. He pointed out that these Alternatives range from 25 percent up to 61 percent. He noted that there has been a fair amount of discussion about how this is a wide open area and there is no other comparable place in town, and about what is the appropriate percentage of the City's future RHNA to place in this quadrant. He indicated that it is a legitimate question, and most people have been mindful of the Council's previous policy discussion that the City will not put all these units there and would like to achieve some sort of a balance. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 7 of 25