My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Posson stated that on the energy side in the memo, he referenced the <br />California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Energy Strategy, which includes some <br />elements about residential, including low- income, as well as some of the measures that <br />local governments can take in order to help get some additional independence. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that a few things have changed since April, one of which <br />is the St. Anton's Partner application which came before the Commission with around <br />190+ points, which is well above other applications that the Commission has <br />considered. He noted that Mr. Smith had indicated that the Energy and Environment <br />Committee is in the process of turning over due to term limits so he did not feel that the <br />group had gelled to the point where a joint review would make sense. He added that <br />the City is losing its Energy and Sustainability Manager at the end of the month, so with <br />that position no longer available, staffing for the Energy and Environment Committee <br />will not be there. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the loss is permanent. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it is permanent for now. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that a few things have changed in comparing the two <br />applicants: the St. Anton project has tightened up a number of its elements by <br />committing to the electrical vehicle charging station, onsite electric generation for the <br />project's common area (a leasing building and community center), a commitment to <br />25 percent better than the Title 24 requirements, which is a significant stride forward, <br />and solar tube skylights for energy conservation. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that the real questions are: "What do we want to see ?" <br />"Which side of the scale do we want to see ?" "Do we want to move further with <br />additional requirements ?" He indicated that to pull this together, the initial suggestion <br />does not appear to be viable based on the changes in the Energy and Environment <br />Committee and City staffing. He noted that in their discussion, Mr. Dolan indicated that <br />Planning staff is intending to require the same type of energy and water conservation <br />measures as those of the St. Anton application for future multi - family projects coming <br />before the Planning Commission, and that the Planning Division intends to bring a <br />number of different ordinances before the Planning Commission for consideration to <br />implement elements of the Climate Action Plan. He stated, however, that there are still <br />a number of multi - family developments and other developments coming before the <br />Commission, and the question is what the Commission wants to do in the interim. He <br />stated that the real purpose of the discussion this evening is what approach the <br />Commission wants to take with respect to energy and water conservation for new <br />developments coming before this Commission. <br />Chair Blank commented that just listening to Commissioner Posson — and the <br />Commissioners who have been around for a while will know — reminds him of the <br />automatic sprinkler system. He stated that when he first got to the Commission, he saw <br />houses burn down because they did not have interior sprinklers. He noted that he just <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 19 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.