My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that it is "built plus approved" because what the <br />build -out is going to be here is already known. He added that this is planning for a new <br />area so it should consider "built plus zoned," what the actual build -out would be. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he thinks staff could come up with some metrics to make a <br />comparison to the rest of the City; however, the average density would be a bit <br />problematic as there are certain considerations, for example, the lakes throw everything <br />off. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that lakes are not a developable area; what is being <br />considered here is the 400 acres. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that if Commissioner O'Connor is referring to growth for the City, then <br />that is a different number. <br />Chair Blank stated that a way to do a weighted average needs to be figured out <br />because there are going to be other areas where there is developable and <br />non - developable acreage. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she thinks there are a lot of ways to show whether or <br />not this is compatible with the rest of the City. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that staff will be keeping that in mind to provide different measure <br />points in addition to just the percentage of multi - family versus single - family. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that that would be helpful. <br />Chair Blank stated that he does not mean to summarize the Commission, but he thinks <br />that Commission has a strong sense that it wants East Pleasanton to be compatible <br />with the rest of the community and not be different or an outlier. <br />Commissioner Olson asked Mr. Dolan, given that RHNA allocations are not established <br />to begin with, why the City would not include preliminary numbers from the Kiewit <br />project and factor those into staff's analysis. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that Kiewit is included in the analysis because they will be numbers <br />that are included in the East Side Specific Plan. He indicated that Kiewit will be <br />developed if Alternative 1 is picked; some percentage of that 1,000 units will be on <br />Kiewit property. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that there were a couple questions from the speakers. <br />Chair Blank stated that one of the speakers was looking for an Environmental Impact <br />Report, and staff has indicated that one will be done. He noted that when that occurs, <br />the public will get a chance to weigh in on what should or should not be included in the <br />Report. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 17 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.