My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 052213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:01 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:39:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
use, and in close proximity to Lake I, is being considered for a possible active recreation <br />park. He pointed to another 34 -acre area right next to the Cope Lake facility, which is <br />only inundated for a very limited portion of the year during severe rainstorms and which <br />has been narrowed down to being what appears to be an ideal open space park site, <br />with a possibility of trails and boardwalks going out into this major habitat. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that along with other community components such as the park, <br />all of the Alternatives show a two -acre neighborhood retail area down at the intersection <br />of Busch Road and El Charro Road. He pointed out that the project economist feels <br />that is the only location where retail would be viable because it would need to draw from <br />workers and residents in the plan area and is also accessible to others passing through <br />this site. He added that there was not much of a market for that use other than at that <br />small location. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that because the acreage of this site is so great, the plan also <br />begs for an open space to extend through this site as there is really no reason to put a <br />major street in that direction (north- south, parallel to El Charro Road) because it would <br />dead end at the lake and at the railroad tracks. He noted that this fine open space <br />would provide a very good service for children to be able to get to the park or to get to <br />maybe a school that is located along the greenbelt. He added that the last thing in <br />terms of community components would be major open space buffers around the outside <br />of the site to screen it from Stanley Boulevard, the railroad tracks, and the storage area. <br />Mr. Rasmussen then discussed the Alternatives, stating that he would spend more time <br />on Alternative 1 than on the others because there are similarities among all the <br />Alternatives. He stated that all the Alternatives show the campus office with some <br />element of retail, based on the thinking that it would be just right perhaps for some <br />lakefront restaurants or other retail in this area and then coming on down El Charro <br />Road. He indicated that there are three acres in proximity to Lake H, Cope Lake habitat <br />and water, and Lake I for which no use has yet been listed and which are shown as a <br />destination use that might include something like a restaurant or two, or a conference <br />facility, or some type of interpretive area, something special at that special location. He <br />continued that farther down shows an active recreational facility by the lake, although <br />there would not be any possible use of the lake, except for visual access, because of <br />the steep banks that go all around Lake I and Lake H. He noted that the office is being <br />located within the APA, and the industrial is kept to the east of El Charro Road because <br />of the quarry plant and the noise it creates, as well as the soils situation in the other <br />area. He added that it would not be appropriate for residential because of the cost to <br />extend residential services there and to take care of its soils problems. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that three of the Alternatives show the relocation of the OSC and <br />PGS Transfer Station away from the residential to an area next to the Vulcan Materials <br />Company. He noted that this is particularly true of the Transfer Station so this can <br />become a much better community without the Transfer Station in the middle of it, and <br />leaves a residential and office area, as well as the open space discussed earlier. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 9 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.