PC 052213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Ms. Testa stated that she does not think there has been proper acknowledgment of the overcrowding in the existing schools. She indicated that it has been a long 20 -year mantra of hers to mitigate the overcrowding in schools, which has continued to grow and develop. She noted that PUSD has tried to downplay the severity of the situation in the community, and it says it may not even feel the need for another elementary school in the area when the reality is that every school in the District is significantly over - capacity, even prior to the approval of the 3,000 units in the rezoned sites. She indicated that even one elementary school would not come close to offsetting and correcting the burden of overcrowding that already exists in the schools because the greatest burden of overcrowding is at the high schools, where there no thought or possibility or opportunity of adding additional space. Ms. Testa stated that in 2011, PUSD put out a school facilities fee justification report which says that the District's current projected enrollment is larger than the pupil capacity, which means that based on State classroom counts, the District, therefore, does not have sufficient capacity to house students generated by future development. She noted that these students will require the District to acquire new school facilities, and PUSD is saying it is not sure it wants to build another school. She indicated that what the community needs to fully understand that this will impact not only the nearby neighborhood but the entire City of Pleasanton, everybody who cares about the schools and about property values, because this will have a serious negative impact on traffic and commuting to schools as well as on the value of and quality of life at these schools. She added that current residents will be asked to pay additional bonds and taxes to offset this, once things hit critical conditions. Ms. Testa stated that the 2011 report says that PUSD has 1,847 un- housed students, that its student - classroom ratio is at 118 percent over capacity, but what it is not saying is that the situation is so much worse at the student -land ratio, which, for Amador High School, for example, is at 160 percent over capacity today. She indicated that she understands the RHNA numbers; she understands that the District is an independent body and that there is limited authority to tell the District what to do, but the Planning Commission has the General Plan, its guideline, which spells out the expectation and the quality of life for the City's schools and specifically calls out school size. She pointed out that it is the Commission's responsibility to not be like ostriches with their heads in the sand, ignoring this serious condition. She stated that she will give staff, and ask staff to provide a copy to the Commission, a list of all the documents and all the sites for all of the information on every school site size, land size, and current capacity. She added that the reason the District is not asking to build another school is because it has gotten itself into a $28,000,000 facility debt, and so as many houses are built, overburdening existing campuses will continue, resulting in negatively affecting the quality of life, not only at the campuses but throughout the community. Chair Blank stated that he has personally known the next speaker, Sherry Barclay, for many, many years and that they have not discussed this matter. He added that he did not know that Ms. Barclay was going to be at the meeting this evening. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 17 of 41