PC 052213 - Laserfiche WebLink

going to be zoned for this type of Alternatives, and never in her wildest dreams did she think she would be sitting here right now looking at all these plans. She added that she is very open to making this work best for the City; however, she is also on the side of trying to make this not a scapegoat for putting all the RHNA numbers. Ms. Liang stated that the City needs to make sure it keeps the community similar in nature to why the residents of Ironwood and surrounding communities bought their houses here. She asked that a balance be kept, a common theme with all the members of the Board today, and make sure all of the opportunities for other areas in the City have been investigated, such as near BART or other rundown areas that were zoned for retail. She indicated that she does not have any idea but believes there has got to be something else out there that maybe has not been looked at. She reiterated that she just really wants to make sure that the City has exhausted all options before saying which Alternative will be selected, that the Commissioners would all be happy with the Alternative if it were in their backyard as well. Ms. Liang stated that when she tells her my friends that live in other parts of Pleasanton about this East Pleasanton plan and how many units are possibly going to be built next to her house, most of them are clueless because they do not live next to it and will not be affected by it, but say they are glad they did not buy next to me. She stated that it is what it is, but the City needs to make sure that the rest of Pleasanton is aware of what is going on and that her neighborhood is not being used as a scapegoat for this exercise. Nancy Allen stated that she agreed with the previous speaker and that she is going to say the same thing but in just a little bit of a different way. She indicated that the City has a tremendous opportunity to create a wonderful community on the East side, and she hopes it is done in a way that is best for the community versus as a scapegoat for RHNA needs. Ms. Allen stated that she would like to address two questions that have been posed: the first is what the mix of single - family versus multi - family housing should be. She stated that in principle, she believes that the neighborhood to be created should be somewhat similar in mix to the rest of Pleasanton, so as not to create some island needing different services, which has a current average percent of single - family homes today of about 75 percent. She added that it is actually 68 percent across the State of California. She indicated that Alternatives 2 and 3 are unhealthy as they create a community just the opposite of the rest of the City, with 67 percent to 72 percent of families living in high- density apartments, a rental type of community which creates a more transient community and where other issues occur because the level of commitment is more rental than ownership. She recommended a minimum of 50 percent single - family homes, closer to Commissioner O'Connor's recommendation and more similar to what Pleasanton currently has. She added that the City may take a little bit of a hit here if necessary, but it should not go all the way to 25 percent of single - family homes and 75 percent of high- density as that would create a whole different community. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 15 of 41