Laserfiche WebLink
for the rest of the planning area, and residential density could be made up by increasing <br />the density slightly in the single - family residential areas or in other areas the City <br />chooses. He noted, however, that the Transfer Station is much more of a difficult <br />planning matter to design around, and because prevailing winds are in this direction, <br />land to the east of the Transfer Station is designed to be industrial because of the odor, <br />noise, garbage truck traffic, appearance, etc. He added that access to the Transfer <br />Station would be by way of a route along Busch Road and then up to El Charro Road. <br />He indicated that the multi - family units are dispersed on the eastern side, with the same <br />spine and other assortment of land uses previously discussed. <br />Mr. Rasmussen concluded his presentation by stating that staff and the consultants <br />have a series of questions that they would like to pose to the Planning Commission for <br />comments and input. <br />Commissioner Olson made an observation that the housing information provided by <br />Ms. Stern is critical information. He indicated that it is clear from the recent election and <br />the emails that have come in on this item that housing is going to be a hot issue here. <br />He noted that he thinks it would be good to include those RHNA housing numbers in <br />what the Commission communicates, both to the other Commissions and to the public. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that El Charro Road is a little differently designed in <br />Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 and that he thought the design of El Charro Road followed the <br />UBG, as shown in one of the slides that showed the UGB. He inquired where exactly <br />the UGB is in relation to El Charro Road. <br />Mr. Rasmussen replied that the UGB line extends down El Charro Road in a straight - <br />line projection. He added that Alternative 1 shows all of El Charro Road within the UGB <br />line. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the UGB line shown in Alternative 1 is pretty close <br />to the actual line. <br />Mr. Rasmussen replied that the actual line is just a little way over from where it is shown <br />right now. He noted that the other three plans show the line coming over to the west, <br />and the reason is that this location would connect to the driveway at Shadow Cliffs and <br />there is a median break and traffic signal there. He stated that another alternative is to <br />bring El Charro Road straight down. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that all the Alternatives show some development <br />occurring outside the UGB, and in a lot of cases, it is just parkland or industrial, except <br />where the road curves, which has some of the other uses such as campus office. He <br />inquired what the mechanism is that would allow development outside the UGB, and <br />what would actually have to happen before that could be done. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 11 of 41 <br />