My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042413
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 042413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:43:47 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:37:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/24/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, O'Connor, Olson, and Posson. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Pearce. <br />Resolution No. PC- 2013 -20 recommending approval to the City Council of Case PUD- <br />94 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />b. Renewable Energy and Water Supply Conservation for New Development <br />This item was considered under 7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION <br />MEMBERS, as Item 7.a. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />a. Renewable Energy and Water Supply Conservation for New Development <br />Brian Dolan stated that this item was brought forward by Commissioner Posson. He <br />indicated that he thinks all the Commissioners have had a chance to look at <br />Commissioner Posson's memo describing the concept and would like Commissioner <br />Posson to speak on behalf of his own item. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that the Commissioners will recall that when they were <br />talking about the Pleasanton Partners LLC development, there was discussion about <br />the application of renewable energy to that project, and Commissioner Pearce <br />mentioned that it may be worthwhile for the Commission to have a policy discussion on <br />how it wants to deal with renewable energy for that application and projects that come <br />before this Commission. He indicated that in view of that, he outlined his thoughts on <br />some areas that he thinks could be improved, primarily in the area of energy and <br />application of renewable energy, as well as drinking water conservation, because both <br />present challenges to the City. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that, as outlined in his memo, AB 32 puts the City on a <br />fossil fuel budget through the control and actual requiring reductions of greenhouse <br />gases. He noted that one of the solutions that is in the General Plan as well as in the <br />California Public Utility Commission strategy for meeting those goals is application of <br />renewable energy on new projects, whether they be residential, commercial, or <br />industrial. He further noted that looking at his review of the current application, he <br />thinks the City is a little weak in the implementation and in a clear description of where <br />and how these requirements are applied for renewable energy. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 24, 2013 Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.