Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Grayson said yes. He explained that the fence from the trash enclosure to the right <br />end of the property will be a six -foot tall concrete masonry unit (CMU) to prevent sound <br />from going through to the residential units; from the trash enclosure to the left end will <br />be picket fence to screen the facility from the commercial buildings behind it. He noted <br />that it is inherent that the CMU fence will be tagged. He indicated that they originally <br />proposed not to put anything there because of the concern about graffiti, but the noise <br />became a bigger issue and they wanted to screen off the remediation systems. He <br />added that just like in any other facility, professional cleaners will come out and remove <br />the tagging as best as possible and as often as necessary. <br />Commissioner O'Connor mentioned that he thinks the Pleasanton Municipal Code has a <br />provision that taggings are to be removed within 48 hours, or something like that, <br />following notification. <br />Chair Blank stated that there will be a condition of approval so that is covered for sure. <br />Commissioner Posson asked Mr. Grayson if it is possible for the owner to request that <br />fuel deliveries occur during normal hours of operation to address the concern about <br />off -hours gas deliveries. <br />Mr. Grayson replied that they can request that and sometimes those are adhered to, but <br />there are no guarantees. He stated that, as Mr. Liu had indicated earlier, these are <br />computer - generated delivery times based on traffic flows, and accidents do happen that <br />delay the deliveries. <br />Commissioner Posson asked Mr. Grayson what process he used to identifying the <br />HOA's in the area and notifying the residents. <br />Mr. Grayson replied that in one of their meetings with the Planning staff, they mentioned <br />that they were looking for the best way to do an outreach, and staff stated that there <br />was no known HOA there, possibly because Planning did not know there was an HOA <br />there. He continued that they then assumed that there was none and did not reach out <br />that way; instead they took the radius map out to 750 feet instead of 1,000 and sent out <br />we flyers as best as they could to hit the majority of the people. He noted that there <br />were several dozen people at the outreach meeting who are obviously not present <br />tonight, except for Mr. McFarlane. <br />Commissioner Posson inquired if they believe they contacted the residents to the west <br />of the project on the other side of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor (ACTC), <br />who are the closest to the facility. <br />Mr. Grayson replied that as he had earlier mentioned, he personally knows that over <br />20 flyers were put into that area. <br />Commissioner Posson asked how many units are in that area. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 16 of 48 <br />