My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031313
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 031313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:36:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan continued that, in terms of this discussion, there is a possible secondary <br />access through Middleton Place, which will definitely be a topic of discussion when that <br />project is reviewed. He added, however, that for the purposes of this discussion, Lund <br />Ranch Road, Sunset Creek Lane, and Sycamore Creek Way are the most important. <br />He emphasized that regardless of which way the Commission decides, staff feels it is <br />very important that the Commission understand these real world implications of what its <br />decision implies. <br />Mr. Dolan then displayed a slide showing the topography off of the end of Sunset Creek <br />Lane, which he calls minor areas of 25- percent slope. He indicated that the way access <br />was planned to be achieved would be at the end of Sunset Creek Lane, where an <br />easement was reserved for the sole purpose of providing access to the Lunch Ranch <br />property. He added that the CC &R's for that subdivision indicate that that connection <br />will be made in the future when the Lund Ranch property is developed. He noted, <br />however, that taking that road and getting it down to the flat part of the Lund Ranch <br />property would entail traversing an area that is a fairly crude measurement of the <br />25- percent slope. He added that the width of that roadway would be probably similar to <br />that of Sunset Creek Lane, but because of the steepness, it would have fairly <br />substantial grading on each side of the cut above and the fill below. He further added <br />that at about the 450 -foot elevation below, there is also a creek to cross, which is a <br />challenge but is something that could be done. <br />Chair Blank asked Mr. Dolan to elaborate on what he meant by "a challenge but could <br />be done." <br />Mr. Dolan explained that environmentally, there is an expense to crossing a creek <br />because it needs to be done in a certain way to avoid habitat. He noted, however, that <br />this was anticipated to be done, at least in the North Sycamore Specific Plan. <br />Mr. Dolan continued that the other issue is the Happy Valley Bypass Road. He <br />displayed a picture of the Spotorno Property with Westbridge Lane going across the <br />bottom and the alignment of the proposed Bypass Road. He noted that the Bypass <br />Road goes around the toe of the steeper slopes at the bottom, but as it moves towards <br />the top and up Sycamore Creek Way, there are substantial areas of 25- percent slope <br />that would have to be traversed. <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that he would consider this issue to be the most difficult and one <br />that will have the most discussion about. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 7 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.