My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031313
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 031313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:36:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: <br />Commissioners Blank, Narum, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: <br />None. <br />ABSTAIN: <br />None. <br />RECUSED: <br />None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolution No. PC- 2013 -12 approving Vesting Tentative Map7975 was entered and <br />adopted as motioned. <br />b. P12 -1820, Stoneridge Properties, LLC (Simon Property Group) <br />Application to amend the Development Agreement and Sewer <br />Agreement for an additional five years regarding an approximately <br />362,790 square foot expansion to the Stoneridge Shopping Center <br />located at 1 -1700 Stoneridge Mall Road. Zoning for the property is the <br />CR(M) — (Regional Commercial — Mall) - District. <br />This item was continued to the April 10, 2013 Planning Commission meeting. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. P12 -1796. City of Pleasanton <br />Application to amend Title 18 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code by <br />adding a new Chapter 18.70, Ridgeline and Hillside Protection and <br />Preservation, with development standards and review procedures for <br />commercial and residential developments in the hillside areas of the <br />City. <br />Commissioner O'Connor recused himself and left the dais. <br />Brian Dolan presented the staff report, stating that the last time it was on the agenda, <br />the Commission actually provided some direction to staff to explore different issues <br />related to this ordinance. He then presented a list of the summary of that direction: <br />1. Consider defining the ridgeline setback as a horizontal plane instead of a ground <br />line. This means looking at not allowing any buildings to extend above the <br />100 -foot line drawn below a ridgeline as opposed to the base of the building. <br />2. Eliminate the exemption process for manufactured slopes, streets, and roads on <br />slopes greater than a 25- percent grade, and for streets or roads to landlocked <br />properties. <br />3. Design and environmental review processes referenced in the proposed chapter <br />for roads and streets is normally done and does not need to be repeated in the <br />draft code chapter. <br />4. Staff should explore providing an inventory of City ridgelines on vacant properties <br />affected by the proposed chapter. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 3 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.