My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031313
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 031313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:36:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
line drawn in terms of how much pre -work staff does for the developer versus letting the <br />developer look at his site plan and say, looking at the topography of his site, these are <br />probably ridge lines; sitting down with staff and going through that review; and at least <br />getting a preliminary review from staff at that time. He added that he could carry this to <br />say what about wetlands, and go ahead and map. <br />Chair Blank stated that developers sit down with staff and spend hundreds of thousands <br />of dollars doing all these plans, and then they come before the Commission, and the <br />Commission says that it's not sure that is the ridgeline, or that it is too dense for that <br />area; then the developer will have to go back and redo the plans, then have to go to the <br />City Council and, depending on the political composition of the Council at the time, they <br />might get a completely different answer. He added that that is not certainty. He <br />indicated that he does not believe that it will take six months to do a ridgeline inventory; <br />it is not that complicated, and he does not buy it. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he does not argue the technical feasibility of doing it, <br />but he is just concerned about whether or not that is a good utilization of staff time, <br />whether staff should be doing it or whether that's something the developers should do <br />as part of their development plan. <br />Chair Blank stated that if the developers do it as part of their development plan, each <br />one will be different, and each one will get a different decision. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that referencing the Historic Preservation Task Force <br />Chair Blank mentioned, the Task Force is talking about doing a survey of old buildings <br />in town and providing every single resident, developer, and commercial property owner <br />with certainty as to what properties are in and what are out, what are historical <br />resources and what are not. She indicated that the reason she asked about how long <br />this would take and what it would involve is because this issue is amorphous and has a <br />lot of moving parts; it does not feel like something that has been nailed down. She <br />added that she believes it will help provide certainty. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she would rather give the direction to the City Council <br />and if staff comes back and says, for example, this is going to cost $1 million or will take <br />three years, the Council can consider it. She noted that given that the Commission <br />prefers the certainty upfront and that it cannot seem to get that information ahead of <br />time, she would prefer to take the conservative approach and propose to the City <br />Council that it at least get the details before turning it down. <br />Commissioner Posson asked Commissioner Pearce is she is proposing a <br />recommendation to the City Council to consider having an inventory of the ridgelines. <br />Commissioner Pearce said yes. <br />Commissioner Posson continued that it would not be included in the ordinance <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 23 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.