Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Narum asked Ms. Diamond to give some examples of where this <br />housing for agricultural employees would apply within the City. <br />Ms. Diamond replied that most of the Agricultural zones where agriculture is occurring <br />now are in Specific Plan areas or in PUDs, and most of them are in the southern end or <br />western end of the City. She indicated that it would be the PUDs or Specific Plans that <br />would govern those agricultural uses and not necessarily this Code amendment. She <br />noted that there may be some agriculturally zoned properties that are not within PUD's <br />or within Specific Plan areas, most of which are being utilized for other uses such as <br />parks or school sites. <br />Ms. Diamond stated that the biggest impact would be on an R -1 lot and in R -1 -zoned <br />(Single - Family Residential) areas which are spread throughout the City. She added that <br />there are currently a number of agricultural uses that are allowed by right, and the <br />Zoning Code does not specify whether they are for commercial or domestic purposes <br />only. She noted that someone with a large R -1 lot could be growing crops for sale at a <br />farmer's market or to a restaurant, and through this Code amendment, those would now <br />be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if those business that are already on -going would be <br />allowed to continue. <br />Ms. Diamond said yes. <br />Commissioner O'Connor further inquired if a business license would be required for <br />commercial purposes. <br />Ms. Stern replied that those would require a business license. <br />Ms. Diamond stated that staff did a search of business licenses, and only two <br />businesses in the City came up as agricultural businesses: one was retail and the other <br />was basically an office use. She noted that when they did another search under <br />alcohol - related businesses, they came up with a handful of wineries that are in <br />operation in the City, and those are within PUDs. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired how this regulation would apply to areas outside the <br />City's Urban Growth Boundary but still within Pleasanton's Sphere of Influence. <br />Ms. Stern replied that because it only applies to standard zoning districts, it would not <br />apply outside the City boundaries. <br />Chair Blank noted that prior to World War I, Pleasanton was a large producer of hops <br />and inquired if there are any commercial agricultural sites in the City. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Irby property is zoned Agricultural. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 13, 2013 Page 9 of 20 <br />