Laserfiche WebLink
get this on the ballot; then they voted at the election and won with 59.52 percent. She <br />further indicated that now, they have to fight about changing the wording of Measure PP <br />so developers can run traffic throughout Sycamore Creek Way and Sunset Creek Lane. <br />She noted that the original plan was to run the traffic through Lund Ranch Road on the <br />other side of the hills. <br />Ms. LeLaurin stated that she moved to this area because she does not want the Los <br />Angeles freeway running through her neighborhood. She indicated that she used to live <br />on a crowded neighborhood in Pleasanton and that she now pays high property taxes to <br />live in a nice neighborhood. <br />Ms. LeLaurin stated that the wording on Measure PP stated that this Initiative can be <br />amended or repealed only by the voters of the City of Pleasanton at a general election. <br />She added that Measure PP is for the people of Pleasanton and not for the developers. <br />She appealed to the Commission to remember that they struggled to get the measure <br />on the ballot, they voted for it, and it won. She asked the Commission to think about <br />them and not change the measure. She added that she has been living in the area for <br />nine years and she is just tired of fighting. She requested that the Commission take this <br />into consideration for the residents of Bridle Creek. <br />Chair Blank asked Ms. Lelaurin if her view would be that Specific Plans should not be <br />exempt from Measure PP in terms of the roads in the Specific Plans that were passed <br />before Measure PP. <br />Ms. LeLaurin said yes. She stated that everything that was written on Measure PP is <br />how she feels and that reason she voted for it. She added that she thinks the road <br />should be going through Lund Ranch Road. <br />Greg O'Connor stated that he drafted a letter that he wanted to be part of the public <br />record. He indicated that because this item will not be heard until the next meeting, he <br />will not go through the entire letter but just highlight a couple of points. <br />Mr. O'Connor stated that Measure PP is actually fairly short, and other speakers have <br />already mentioned that the only way to make an exception to Measure PP is through a <br />general election of the voters. He added that Measure PP also says that it overrides <br />any existing General Plan, and by reference within the General Plan, it assumes it <br />overrides the Specific Plans as well. He stated that Specific Plans and the General <br />Plan really do not give any property rights to any individual, unlike a PUD or a <br />development plan would. <br />Mr. O'Connor stated that he did not intend to speak in specifics, but indicated that the <br />Lund Ranch II project that was brought up tonight actually is not part of the North <br />Sycamore Specific Plan and, therefore, is not covered by that. He added that the <br />agreements mentioned that were made with other homeowners and other developers <br />never extended to the owners of Lund Ranch ll. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 13, 2013 Page 7 of 20 <br />