My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 021313
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 021313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:35:10 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum stated that she had one item that she would like to throw out: the <br />three different PUD Planning documents that govern the Hacienda Business Park, <br />which were last reviewed in 1993. She indicated that her priority would be to take <br />those, review them, and consolidate them into one document so that any company <br />coming in would know what the expectation is as far as getting approval for whatever it <br />is it wants to do. <br />Chair Blank noted that it would be a humungous task but is very much related to <br />Planning and sounds like a good idea. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the separate documents were meant to be <br />addendums so it is really only one document. <br />Commissioner Narum replied that one document is pre -1993 wherein businesses had to <br />mitigate their traffic back to a Level -of- Service C; the second was where businesses <br />were assigned a trip rate or a traffic count that was then subtracted off the total; and the <br />third was for schools, health and public safety, and housing. <br />Mr. Dolan added that on top of that entire PUD are the development standards and <br />design guidelines that were recently adopted. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that prioritization by the Commission is designed to tell the <br />City Council what the Commission thinks is really important. He indicated that the <br />Commission and staff are already working on the East Pleasanton Specific Plan, and if <br />the Commission were to list it as a priority, the Commission is fundamentally telling the <br />City Council to keep the pressure on that subject and to make sure that it is progressing <br />and not getting side - tracked because it is a huge committee. He continued that his <br />second point is the Hacienda planning documents, which he is not familiar with. He <br />noted that if they have not been reviewed for a long time, it would be a good thing to <br />consider because it is a really important area for the City in terms of revenue <br />generation. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he thinks the East Pleasanton Specific Plan should <br />be on the list as that will really define what is going to happen for the large area that is <br />still undeveloped. He agreed with Commissioner Olson to keep the pressure on the <br />group so it keeps moving. He indicated that another piece is the Climate Action Plan <br />implementation. He noted that having a hand in crafting that, he thinks there is a lot of <br />activity that really flows over to Planning. He added that at the last meeting he <br />attended, Mr. Dolan came and spoke to its planning issues and progress. He indicated <br />that this is something that this Commission could look at, help move on, and take to the <br />next level as far as sustainability for the City is concerned. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 13, 2013 Page 12 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.