Laserfiche WebLink
3. Appendix C: Delete clarification Ro. 2: <br />O. rGRtRiRl; ... <br />... in L'Yermore. This suggests the ALLIC is likewise amendable to othe <br />smmm'aF ameRdFneRts to the ... <br />i.A.fithqn thp same safety and neise zones Of the use in net ene ef paFtqG61laF concern <br />to the ALUG as listed in seGtqGn. 3.3.2.9. of the ALUCP] <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that in the first full paragraph of the second page of <br />Exhibit A of the staff report, if the last line of the redline text that was crossed out which <br />reads: "No residential land use designations are located within the Airport Protection <br />Area." is struck out, it would mean that residential will be allowed in the APA. <br />Chair Blank noted that it is a good catch and thanked Commissioner O'Connor. He <br />indicated that he is amenable to un- striking that language. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that it is consistent and Mr. Dolan appears to be fine with <br />it. <br />Chair Blank noted that the Commission is getting a last- minute legal interpretation of it. <br />Ms. Stern replied that she is not quite sure that is an interpretation but wondered if that <br />is struck out because of Zone 4 actually allowing it. <br />Chair Blank stated that maybe what it should say is "No Pleasanton residential land use <br />designation shall be located within the Airport Protection Area" as there are areas in the <br />Airport Protection Area that are not in Pleasanton. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if the residential land use designation is within <br />Pleasanton. <br />Ms. Stern replied that it is in the ALUC Plan. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that it goes back to her original question; with these <br />different zones now going to have residential, that she thought there could be no <br />residential in the APA. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that it is the same thing and that she thought this section <br />was only referencing this map. She requested staff clarification that policy is separate <br />from this map. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. She indicated that it is describing the new plan. <br />Chair Blank inquired if Pleasanton is not jeopardizing itself by striking this language. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 9, 2013 Page 19 of 20 <br />