Laserfiche WebLink
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Blank stated that he was thinking about what Ms. Ayala just said and about <br />Mr. Dolan's comment about Livermore and noted that Livermore having high- density <br />housing near the BART station is just as unsafe as Pleasanton having high- density <br />housing in the airport area in the East Pleasanton Plan. He indicated that he personally <br />thinks it is an error for Livermore to put high- density housing near an airport because it <br />is unsafe and exposes people to noise and pollution and all sorts of issues stemming <br />from the airport. He added that he can understand from a political perspective why <br />Livermore chose to lobby for that. He stated that Livermore wants that BART station <br />and they are going to make it as attractive as possible for whoever does BART to put <br />that BART station there, and the attraction of high- density housing is one of them. He <br />indicated that he believes Livermore chose to make what he considers to be an error in <br />judgment and apologized to anyone from the Livermore community, but he does not <br />think Pleasanton should make that same error in judgment. <br />Commissioner Narum basically agreed with Chair Blank. She stated that she does not <br />really care about what Livermore is doing, but it comes down to Pleasanton is better <br />than that. She noted that it is just not an appropriate place for housing, and one only <br />has to look at other airports where housing has been put nearby and realize how people <br />are complaining and trying to shut the airport down. She stated that it just does not <br />make sense to her at this point to have that flexibility and has some questions as this <br />relates to East Pleasanton. She noted that the Task Force seems to have a lot of <br />interest in open space and questioned if this is going to create some problems with <br />some of the things that are envisioned for the Specific Plan of that area. <br />Ms. Stern stated that the Task Force has made some clarifications relating to the <br />existing lakes, which have been clarified as existing uses and cannot be removed from <br />the Plan; however, adding lakes or doing things like crops or the solar field was <br />discussed, and she recalls that the Plan could affect solar array which would have an <br />impact on those kind of open space uses like a golf course. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that in other words, the City would not be doing a 4 -H farm <br />out there. <br />Ms. Stern said no. She indicated that it would be necessary to at least review that with <br />the Task Force and make modifications. <br />Chair Blank stated that to a great extent, open spaces are traditionally generally <br />considered compatible airport uses, and that is why there are a lot of golf courses by <br />airports. He noted that they are open, and if something does happen, some golfers may <br />be affected, but that is better than taking out a school. He add that typically farms and <br />solar panel installations are reviewed, and people think that they are reasonably <br />compatible because they are open and there are no obstacles as opposed to a wind <br />farm or something similar. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 9, 2013 Page 11 of 20 <br />