My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121212
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 121212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:21:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Blank stated that this is an exceptionally well- designed layout. <br />C. Are the proposed on -site recreation facilities and amenities acceptable? <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she heard music to her ears about places to throw a <br />football. She indicated that she is pretty consistent about wanting these to have large <br />enough green space for children to throw a football as well as the tot lot. She added <br />that she is thrilled that the applicants have done a great job in distributing that through <br />the development. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed. He indicated that having three acres of green space <br />is fantastic. <br />Commissioners Pearce and Olson agreed. <br />Acting Chair Blank stated that one cannot argue with that. <br />D. Is the treatment of the corner of Bernal Avenue and Stanley Boulevard (four <br />stone pilasters and a low - profile stone sign wall arranged in a curve, with <br />two ornamental trees behind the pilasters and sign wall) adequate? <br />Commissioner Olson commented that it is hard to find anything wrong with this project, <br />but he considers this as the weak point of the project. He indicated that it leaves him <br />flat and thinks it needs a little more thought or creativity. <br />Acting Chair Blank inquired if it can look like the other ones the Commission has <br />approved, which looked really cool. <br />Commissioner Pearce agreed. She noted that this is a gateway and would love to see <br />a more detailed- oriented approach to the sign. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed. She stated that she actually has the renderings from the <br />Pleasanton Gateway project, and that turned out so wonderful in reality. She indicated <br />that this proposal makes her a little nervous; that in the depiction, it looks like two of the <br />trees are floating and she has trouble getting beyond that although she know what the <br />intent was. She suggested that they beef it up a little more or make it a little more <br />dramatic. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not have a problem with it but is open to <br />some changes. He noted that thought this would be a great corner to do some <br />enhancement on signage for the place but does not know where that would fit in. He <br />indicated, however, that he is indifferent and could take it the way it is; that he does not <br />think it is a major problem but enhancement can always make things look nicer. <br />Acting Chair Blank stated that he does not think it is a major problem but agreed with <br />Commissioner Olson that it left him a little flat. He indicated that when he thinks about <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2012 Page 32 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.