My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121212
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 121212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:21:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce stated that given what the applicant has said, she is comfortable <br />with the garage door situation because they would be articulated in ways other than <br />recession. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Commissioner Pearce. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she served with Commissioner Pearce on developing <br />these things and she feels they have met the intent in just a little different way. She <br />added that it is something they did not think about, and the applicant are not just saying <br />they want it all flush but are proposing alternatives with different materials and different <br />looks, which she finds to be actually positive. She indicated that she can support this <br />exception. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed. He stated that the two -foot recession is one way to <br />break up the mass and that he would rather they have more than one way. He <br />indicated that if the applicant will look at different ways of breaking up that massing, he <br />thinks that would be better than having all garage doors at a two -foot recession. <br />Acting Chair Blank agreed. <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that other people have asked for this exception but have proposed <br />different solutions that were not all the same, and staff ultimately does not have an <br />issue with some variation from this guideline. He stated that what staff has seen before <br />are requests for less than two feet or some combination of meeting the guideline and <br />not meeting the guideline using these other techniques. He noted that to have <br />100 - percent flush garage doors is not ideal, and having that with something else would <br />be a lesser solution than a mix of approaches. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that the applicant proposed or showed some options, one <br />with a little overhang, and another using a trim or different materials or lattice work. She <br />asked Mr. Dolan if he felt that satisfied or met the intent of the Guidelines. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that there is a certain look that comes with the setback in terms of the <br />shadow line, and what it does to what can be a pretty monotonous row of garage doors <br />that is a little bit different. He added that he did not think 100 percent lattice work would <br />be quite as effective either. He noted that the proposed exception does achieve the <br />same objective at some level, but there are probably some key locations that would be <br />better -off held to some setback of the door. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if somewhat less than two feet might be one. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that there is nothing magical about two feet, but that is what was <br />decided in the Guidelines. He added that staff would be happy to work with the <br />applicant on what locations work. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2012 Page 30 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.