My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121212
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 121212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:21:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Steinberg stated that one of the other major changes they have made is the building <br />heights and the variety: one -, two -, and three -story buildings; very low around the <br />perimeter; all two stories stepping to ones on some of the corners; stepping up to three <br />stories with a combination of twos; an element of four stories way in the back, which will <br />give a very nice sense and reinforce this idea of a village: different heights, different <br />personalities; different kinds of open spaces for each of the villages. <br />Acting Chair Blank inquired if on Bernal Avenue, the buildings start off with two stories. <br />Mr. Steinberg replied that they are really pushing those heights up and down: from <br />Bernal Avenue, the whole thing starts with two stories, then goes up to three stories, <br />and then drops down to one story; and from Stanley Boulevard, it starts with two stories, <br />steps up to three stories, and steps down to two stories. He added that both streets <br />terminate on the centerpiece, the recreation and leasing building in the middle. <br />Acting Chair Blank noted that it might be interesting to see what it would look like if all <br />the corners had one stories, the next ones step up as a two -story, and then up to the <br />three stories, so a gradual transition might add some articulation. He added that it is <br />difficult to tell without the visuals. <br />Mr. Steinberg replied that there is a difference between Stanley Boulevard and Bernal <br />Avenue. He explained that on Stanley Boulevard, they have a corner one -story, three <br />higher in the middle, and then two, such that instead of the building being symmetrical, <br />it feels a little bit more organic. He continued that on the other side, they are really <br />wrapping the majority with two -story, then drop down to one -story toward the cul -de- <br />sac, where it terminates. He added that it is then counter - pointed by something that is <br />three stories to get some variety. He noted that at the entrance, they are doing just as <br />Acting Chair Blank stated: instead of going from one -story to two -story, it goes from <br />two -story up to three, and then down to one, having that same kind of variety. He <br />indicated that having one- story on Bernal Avenue would feel a little weak and might not <br />hold the street as well as having a two -story. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired why they chose to do four stories even though there is a <br />little blip of four -story. She stated that she thought they would have taken that little bit of <br />four -story and put it on the back to kind of extend that line of four - stories along the <br />whole back side. <br />Mr. Steinberg replied that they did that for several reasons. He stated that this is their <br />major activity pool space, and he likes holding that outdoor room with two equal sides, <br />and he did thought the four -story would be a little invasive and did not need to come <br />over there. He indicated that he finds it more interesting to hold the four back, see the <br />three, let the four peak -out and then, instead of just ending it so sharp, bring it around. <br />He noted that this is a nice pedestrian entry so they are really framing, which the <br />Guidelines say. He added that a bigger building should have a serious expression of <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2012 Page 26 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.