PC 112812 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Pearce stated that she is in the Task Force and that she has the Historic Context Statement in front of her. She noted that there was a statement made earlier that the Historic Context Statement was a series of criteria. She explained that it is not actually that; it certainly talks about the national criteria and the state criteria, but the purpose was the identification of the City's historic resources. She added that the reason the City spent $25,000 to do this is because the Task Force is tasked with developing more appropriate criteria for preservation of historic structures in the City, and the way the Task Force decided to go about doing this was to ascertain what periods of history are important to the City of Pleasanton and extrapolate City values from that. She indicated that the Task Force is in the middle of this process, and that is the reason she asked the question about whether or not this project is time - sensitive. Commissioner Pearce continued that the Task Force was formed by the City Council because the criteria in place no longer made any sense to this City. She noted that she does not care if somebody important lived there or if something important happened there; she cares about whether or not it is important to the City. She reiterated that the Task Force is in the middle of this process, and she is not inclined to make a decision about the demolition of a house at this time because she does not know what the Task Force is going to do. She added, however, that if the applicant really needs to go forward with this, she is inclined to be more conservative and promote the preservation of this structure because she certainly does not want to say it can be demolished only to have the Task Force come back when it has completed its mission and say that this would have been something the City would have encouraged preservation of. Commissioner Pearce stated that she has walked this structure; she was inside it and around it, and this structure is certainly in much better shape than the structure at the DiDonato site. She indicated that she loves Ms. Bourg's idea, and that ideally, she would like to see this preserved. She indicated that she has talked to David DiDonato and to Paul Martin, and they are encouraging moving the DiDonato house even though they have been given license to demolish it. She stated that she would love to see it moved across the street. She concluded that because the Task Force is in the middle of ascertaining what is important to the City, she cannot support demolishing the structure at this point. Commissioner O'Connor indicated that he has not been on the inside of the home so it is difficult to really comment on whether or not it should be demolished. He stated that with respect to No. 4, however, given the age of the structure, his gut feeling is that lacking a final conclusion of the Task Force at this time and just going by the historic documents that the Commission is asking applicants to go out and fund in connection with what it takes to get on a registry, there will be no more than five or six homes in the City that will make it. He noted that the Commission is talking about preserving a look and a feel in this town, which means that a lot more than just those that meet the registry-type homes needs to be preserved. He added that when structures are 80, 90, or 100 years old, he thinks the Commission really needs to be very careful. He noted that the City has already taken down too many of them, and if in these sensitive areas, it is much easier for a developer to clear the land and start fresh than it is to have to work PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 28, 2012 Page 17 of 38